That is a very unconvincing argument - what, more McCains? What about some of the other Senators like the ones from Maine and Alaska. Do you thing these two wenam are the type we should have leading this Country? - I do not.
On another note, I did not get a chance to see your former congressman on TV today - what did you think, if you saw him?
I agree. However the "Two" Party system (more a two wing UniParty) is what we have. You have to play the cards you're dealt.
Cruz did a great job even when they had the picture of his dad making the kill shot on JFK. F Chuck did everything he could to not allow Ted a chance to speak.
>>Forcing people to think<<
OK...your turn to think.
If there is enough of a majority, and the leadership isn't feckless or wimpy, even the most communist, baby-killing, faggot loving RINO, who never votes with the caucus, has a value...and that is; the "R" after its name. 51 party members control the Senate, but not real well. However, 65 or 70 is a pretty good number.
The Senate Majority leader controls the committee assignments and the majority party gets all the chairmanships AND a majority of members on any committee. He also controls what legislation makes it to the floor of the Senate.
Do you thing these two wenam are the type we should have leading this Country? - I do not.
I see that it's time for more forced thinging.
They're not "leading this Country"....they only think they do. They are only 1 out of 100 votes, and unless they are a swing vote, and very purchasable....they don't control shiite.