Skip to comments.The Kamala Harris Example
Posted on 12/07/2019 3:49:12 AM PST by Kaslin
The 1989 Cher song "If I Could Turn Back Time" comes to mind when I think about the end of the Kamala Harris's campaign to be the Democratic candidate for president. Maybe you remember the song -- "If I could turn back time/if I could find a way/I'd take back those words that've hurt you and you'd stay." Well, if Sen. Harris had a time machine, I suspect she would go back to about exactly a year ago, when she decided to attack a federal district court nominee regarding his membership in the Knights of Columbus.
Here's one of the questions she asked Nebraska court nominee Brian Buescher in writing: "Since 1993, you have been a member of the Knights of Columbus, an all-male society comprised primarily of Catholic men. In 2016, Carl Anderson, leader of the Knights of Columbus, described abortion as 'a legal regime that has resulted in more than 40 million deaths.' Mr. Anderson went on to say that 'abortion is the killing of the innocent on a massive scale.' Were you aware that the Knights of Columbus opposed a woman's right to choose when you joined the organization?"
It doesn't take too much awareness to realize that opposition to abortion isn't a weird hang-up for Carl Anderson or the Knights of Columbus, but a no-compromise position for many religious believers, and certainly for the Catholic Church -- despite prominent "as a Catholic" dissenters like Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Joe Biden, also in the race for the Democratic nomination for president.
Harris' questions betrayed an ignorance -- at best -- of the largest fraternal organization in the world. And it didn't take long for people on the right and left to call her out for showing anti-Catholic bigotry that betrayed an intolerance for people of faith with traditional views on human life and marriage.
Both Buescher, who joined the Knights at 18 (as many of my male friends in college did), and the Knights deserve better than Harris's treatment. And people know that -- which is no small reason why her campaign never really had the kind of following that would have kept her as a contender for the long haul.
People who don't even have much contact with the Knights associate them with good citizenship. It's not unusual to be familiar with the Knights for coat drives or pancake breakfasts or other charity and fellowship opportunities. The Knights have a storied history of fighting for religious freedom and being leaders and enablers of robust Christian generosity -- the stuff of the Beatitudes.
In recent memory, the Knights successfully petitioned the Obama administration to recognize the so-called Islamic State genocide in Iraq. They are known to rush to the scene of natural disasters and have been beacons of light in the wake of mass shootings, including in Sandy Hook in 2012 or Highlands Ranch, Colorado this year. They are instruments of community building, healing, education, prayer and civic responsibility.
I gave Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard a lot of credit for taking Sen. Harris on at the start of this year in an opinion column (just days before she threw her own hat into the primary ring). It was smart politically, but it was also the right thing to do. It was a healthy sign for the Democratic party -- that someone would have the courage to take on anything involving abortion.
This is part of how Gabbard put it: "We must stand together, and with one voice condemn those who seek to incite bigotry based on religion. We cannot allow those who are anxious to exploit our differences to drive a wedge between us. We cannot and will not tolerate prejudicial treatment of those with whom we disagree, any more than we would tolerate such treatment of those with whom we agree."
We're still a people who purport to be about freedom. Let's be serious and rigorous about that, especially when we are talking about powerhouses of civil society, the meditating institutions that make our country work, that love and serve with a heart the government can never and will never have.
We're a better people for the Knights of Columbus, and Americans know it. Harris clearly didn't know this, and it haunted her campaign. Let her mistake be a cautionary tale:
Don't take on the good guys.
Stupid Kamala ----after the Kenyan atrocity, she figured to must be ok to wade into the murky abortion waters ....and to attack a Catholic nominee.
Her ignorance is memorable.
Then again, attacking Catholics is the only way the poor thing could get exposure.....
unless she got on her knees in the House cloak room...............cackle.
The Knights of Columbus are the primary funders of Narcotics Anonymous in many places.
I wouldn’t know.
It’s good to be reminded of this aspect of Sen. Harris, but I doubt it had much to do with the lack of support for her all-around garbage candidacy.
The worst thing about it all is that she’s still a United States Senator.
And a lot of other good stuff. Our Council just did a fundraiser, in conjunction with the Cub Scouts, to fund the Knights’ support of programs for the mentally handicapped. We’ll be delivering Christmas trees, wreaths, and poinsettias all weekend!
I dont think Harris lost many votes in the Democrat party by attacking the Knights of Columbus.
Which goes to show the many losing position they hold......
Her attack violated the constitutions prohibition that there shall be no religious test for public servants.
Epstein did not kill himself and “heel-up” Harris is not eligible to be president.
With the "pope francis" attacking Catholics, they don't need a potential president to go after them, too.
“Harris’ questions betrayed an ignorance — at best — of the largest fraternal organization in the world.”
A little side note here. They are not the largest fraternal organization in the world. The Knights of Columbus number around 1.7 million world wide. Freemasons number around 6 million in the world not including the count of Prince Hall Masons that exceeds another quarter of a million. KOC is a solid group, but far from he biggest.
Her running while ineligible attacked the Constitution.
Leftist Postergirl for Religious Intollerance
In addition to his mis-step, Kamala should have found out from the first jump what the Constitution says about NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
Clause 5 clearly states who is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
Obama was NOT NBC. Howard Dean & Pelosi fronted for Obama & look at the 8 ++++ years of grief we are enduring.
“Clause 5 clearly states who is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.”
Unfortunately I cannot agree that it states the matter clearly, I wish it did. I am 75 and was taught in grade school that only someone who is the offspring of TWO people who are American citizens at the time of his birth and who is born on American soil is a natural born citizen. I don’t see that stated in the constitution though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.