Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump signs bill expressing support for Hong Kong protestors
Axios ^

Posted on 11/27/2019 3:31:33 PM PST by MassMinuteman

President Trump signed the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act on Wednesday, reaffirming U.S. support for the city's autonomy after months of pro-democracy protests.

Why it matters: The bill, which was passed with overwhelming bipartisan support in both the Senate and the House, serves as a major rebuke of China at a time when Washington and Beijing are engaged in critical trade talks. China has warned that it will take retaliatory measures if the bill becomes law.

Between the lines: Even if Trump had declined to sign the bill, it would still likely have the two-thirds support in Congress necessary to override a veto. In a statement acknowledging the signing, Trump noted that certain aspects of the bill would "interfere" with his "constitutional authority to state the foreign policy of the United States."

"I signed these bills out of respect for President Xi, China, and the people of Hong Kong. They are being enacted in the hope that Leaders and Representatives of China and Hong Kong will be able to amicably settle their differences leading to long term peace and prosperity for all." — President Trump

(Excerpt) Read more at axios.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; chinaagenteee; chinasucks; eeechinatroll; hongkong; kag; maga; masterstatesman; taiwan; trump; trumpasia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

[I’m certainly not disregarding the Hong Kong demonstrations.

I’m just saying that this bill conveniently came on the scene right during sensitive trade and other talks with China.

Also, you and I both know that if Trump weren’t President, nobody would be batting an eyelash over the Hong Kong demonstrations or China’s systematic abuse of political prisoners.

They’ve been doing this s—t for decades even in 1989 GHWB still gave them MFN status for trade right after Tienanmen Square Massacre. ]


That’s like asking if we gave a damn about armed robbery, why do we wait until a perp has committed x number of armed robberies before putting him away for life? Because giving life terms to felons costs money. And sanctioning China has an economic cost.

The meaning of this near-unanimous vote is that China’s sins have finally gotten to the point that we can’t stand aside any more. Xi is now starting to figure out that Uncle Sam has had enough and he won’t take it any more. And if he ignores this warning/ranging shot, he is going to be unpleasantly surprised when Uncle Sam begins to fire for effect.


21 posted on 11/27/2019 4:51:20 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MassMinuteman
Imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.

George Orwell

It appears the Hong Police are putting their Communist Party training to good use:


22 posted on 11/27/2019 4:58:24 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Right. After President Trump mentioned it last night. He is close to a deal and putting the squeeze on the ChiComs.

Congress passed it a week ago, but President Trump just signed it into law.


23 posted on 11/27/2019 5:00:29 PM PST by Dacula (Epstein did not kill himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
That’s like asking if we gave a damn about armed robbery, why do we wait until a perp has committed x number of armed robberies before putting him away for life?

Your analogy is completely specious and has no bearing on the defined topic at hand.

The meaning of this near-unanimous vote

Which again, was produced by the majority of Congresscrats who are simultaneously pocketing millions of dollars from the Chinese gov't, and wouldn't have done this if anyone else was POTUS (nor would Hong Kong have gotten extensive media coverage). But Orange Man Bad.

is that China’s sins have finally gotten to the point that we can’t stand aside any more.

China just started imprisoning, torturing, and sending political prisoners to the gulag JUST NOW under Trump? They've been doing this since Chiang Kia-Shek fled to Taiwan in 1948. That Tienanmen Square massacre thingy, and we still gave them MFN status just days later. How do you explain that?

Xi is now starting to figure out that Uncle Sam has had enough and he won’t take it any more.

Yeah, all because of Trump's boss negotiation skills. But he's being backstabbed by Congresscrats because they don't want the evil Orange Man to succeed. Ever hear of Saving Face? That's why Trump has advanced re: negotiation with NK and China than all of his predecessors combined. They don't like to be called out on this when they're probably talking to Trump already about it.

24 posted on 11/27/2019 5:01:58 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (20 FReepin' years of Freakin' FReeping!!! FReep yeah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Hong Kong’s Polytechnic Uni after it’s occupation by “Democracy” Protestors.
Some wish to go to Australia to finish their studies. I understand Uni Students in Australia do not want them to come.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1198074940446003200


25 posted on 11/27/2019 5:05:21 PM PST by sockmonkey (I am an America First, not Israel First FReeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

[Your analogy is completely specious and has no bearing on the defined topic at hand. ]


You’re entitled to your opinion, but we usually give people a threshold of a certain number of offenses before the cell door slams shut forever. If we gave a damn about Japanese attacks against US shipping, why did we not go after them in the wake of the attack on the Panay? Why did we wait until Pearl Harbor? Again - there’s a threshold. Nobody knows in advance what that threshold is, but when it is reached, the other guy will definitely find out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Panay_incident#Responsibility_for_the_attack
[Modern historians believe that the attack may have been intentional. According to John Prados, Navy cryptographers had intercepted and decrypted traffic relating to the attacking planes which clearly indicated that they were under orders during the attack and that it had not been a mistake of any kind. This information was not released at the time for obvious secrecy reasons. Writer Nick Sparks believes that the chaos in Nanking created an opportunity for renegade factions within the Japanese army who wanted to force the U.S. into an active conflict so that the Japanese could once and for all drive the U.S. out of China.[13]]

The stuff about renegade factions is, of course, BS. The Japanese military was the power behind the throne, much as Japan’s shoguns, rather than the emperor, were the real rulers of Japan for 400 years before the Meiji Restoration theoretically made the emperor’s writ the law of the land again.


26 posted on 11/27/2019 5:25:26 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
You’re entitled to your opinion

Coddling China for decades and Congresscrats benefiting from backroom deals and then suddenly becoming concern trolls isn't "opinion." It simply means their gravy train is about to expire and they're desperately taking a cheap shot at POTUS to prevent it.

but we usually give people a threshold of a certain number of offenses before the cell door slams shut forever.

Except nothing was done and business as usual continued after the biggest threshold was crossed in 1989 just days after the Tiananmen Square massacre.

If we gave a damn about Japanese attacks against US shipping, why did we not go after them in the wake of the attack on the Panay?

Again, you are trying to correlate past history into current events that are not relevant nor meet the situation that's unfolding at hand.

Why did we wait until Pearl Harbor? Again - there’s a threshold. Nobody knows in advance what that threshold is, but when it is reached, the other guy will definitely find out.

In a nutshell - I don't CARE what China does with the Uighur Muslims. I don't care what they do internally, their human rights record, etc. I believe Trump has a plan re: Hong Kong and is working it in with the sensitive trade deals with China until Congress had to stick their grubby paws into it. But you can't just knee-jerk and try to submit legislation that puts Trump in a bind, because Asian culture is all about respect and honor. These are very serious, very sensitive negotiations going on here and Congress as usual is f--king it up.

27 posted on 11/27/2019 5:37:15 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (20 FReepin' years of Freakin' FReeping!!! FReep yeah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

[Coddling China for decades and Congresscrats benefiting from backroom deals and then suddenly becoming concern trolls isn’t “opinion.” It simply means their gravy train is about to expire and they’re desperately taking a cheap shot at POTUS to prevent it. ]


But that’s exactly what happened with Japan even after the attack on the Panay. Then the dam broke with the attack on Pearl Harbor. Again, nobody knows what the threshold is. The fact that the US let the sinking of the Panay slide may have given the Japanese the idea that the US would just write off Pearl Harbor. They were wrong.


28 posted on 11/27/2019 5:43:07 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Stop worrying.

China has no choice but accept whatever we offer them.

It’s fine to defend Hong Kong and demand trade capitulation.


29 posted on 11/27/2019 5:49:18 PM PST by lonestar67 (America is exceptional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MassMinuteman

Trump 1 China 0...Win!!


30 posted on 11/27/2019 5:50:14 PM PST by Deplorable American1776 (Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
If you're going to use that as an example, then all ties to China should have been cut after the Korea War. China sent thousands of troops ("volunteers" they called them, typical Communist prop) when the US/UN forces retook the 38th parallel and was on the verge of capturing Pyongyang.

You still ignore the fact that Presidents from GHWB-Obama did nothing about China, and even Clinton gave them military technology as we all know.

I support HK, and of course denounce China from cracking down on them. But a Congressional resolution simply isn't the right way to go about this.

31 posted on 11/27/2019 5:50:49 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (20 FReepin' years of Freakin' FReeping!!! FReep yeah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67

I think that’s basically true. We win the game as long as we decide we want to play the game.

Prior to Trump, no American President has wanted to play the game. They all just surrendered. But this time we will win.


32 posted on 11/27/2019 5:50:54 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67
Stop worrying.

Who's worrying? All I'm saying is that Trump likely has this intertwined with any trade negotiations and talks but here you have Congress doing this to put him in a tight spot. This is a cheap political stunt by Congress, who wouldn't have done this if Trump wasn't President. In fact, nobody wouldn't have gave a damn if thousands of HK protesters were massacred if it happened during a President Hillary or Jeb.

33 posted on 11/27/2019 5:53:04 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (20 FReepin' years of Freakin' FReeping!!! FReep yeah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

[Except nothing was done and business as usual continued after the biggest threshold was crossed in 1989 just days after the Tiananmen Square massacre. ]


That’s not much of a threshold, considering Nixon normalized relations with China despite the fact that without China’s copious assistance to North Korea and North Vietnam, most of the 100,000 GI’s killed in the Korean and Vietnam Wars would have survived. That’s not even factoring the mass killings and famines, for which the Party was responsible, that killed tens of millions.

Note that Tiananmen Square was ignored with the idea that the Chinese were in the initial stages of reform and Deng Xiaoping was locked in a factional struggle with elements of the party that wanted to return to central economic planning. Bush I was presumably leery of letting China return to what it was - a supersized North Korea.

The theory was that possibility of reform and peaceful democratization existed - the Bolsheviks had been forced from power in Russia, more or less peacefully, after 70 years. Perhaps China’s rulers would similarly fall prey to reformists from within, much as Yeltsin, a member of the Soviet nomenklatura took power. That hope is now moribund. China’s Communist Party has ruled the country for 70 years. It remains dictatorial and, what’s worse, appears bent on territorial expansion. Its grace period is over.


34 posted on 11/27/2019 5:53:29 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
no American President has wanted to play the game.

They weren't playing a game.

Politicians in Washington were completely *compromised* and bought and paid for by the Chinese.

Until Trump came along, who has been saying this crap since the 80s that China was ripping us off.

35 posted on 11/27/2019 5:58:35 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (20 FReepin' years of Freakin' FReeping!!! FReep yeah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
That’s not much of a threshold

Tienanmen Square wasn't a threshold to you? What is, aside of duplicating a Rwanda-like genocide?

considering Nixon normalized relations with China despite the fact that without China’s copious assistance to North Korea and North Vietnam, most of the 100,000 GI’s killed in the Korean and Vietnam Wars would have survived. That’s not even factoring the mass killings and famines, for which the Party was responsible, that killed tens of millions.

But Nixon was using China to act as a check on Soviet aggression, although I'll concede it was somewhat of a boneheaded move to normalize relations with them. And how would Nixon would have known China would become the superpower it is now (thanks to GHWB and Clinton). Also China played a minuscule, if any, role in Vietnam. Vietnam and China are arch-enemies.

Note that Tiananmen Square was ignored with the idea that the Chinese were in the initial stages of reform

Do you really want me to insert British TV comedian John Oliver's pounding the desk and laughing gif here? Tiananmen Square was ignored because DC had extensive ties to them.

and Deng Xiaoping was locked in a factional struggle with elements of the party that wanted to return to central economic planning. Bush I was presumably leery of letting China return to what it was - a supersized North Korea.

But Bush I put the welcome mat down for China then and their power accelerated when Clinton became POTUS. There was no real opposition from the U.S. gov't to China since the end of WWII, only kickbacks and bribes.

The theory was that possibility of reform and peaceful democratization existed - the Bolsheviks had been forced from power in Russia, more or less peacefully, after 70 years. Perhaps China’s rulers would similarly fall prey to reformists from within, much as Yeltsin, a member of the Soviet nomenklatura took power. That hope is now moribund. China’s Communist Party has ruled the country for 70 years. It remains dictatorial and, what’s worse, appears bent on territorial expansion. Its grace period is over.

Dude, China is the same as it ever was. They are simply pissed that Trump is not playing their game and DC is pissed that their bribes and kickbacks are coming to an end. That's why they concerned trolled Trump over HK with this stupid resolution.

36 posted on 11/27/2019 6:31:19 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (20 FReepin' years of Freakin' FReeping!!! FReep yeah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
Sorry, I'm gonna post it anyway to your incoherent posts.


37 posted on 11/27/2019 6:35:49 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (20 FReepin' years of Freakin' FReeping!!! FReep yeah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

[Tienanmen Square wasn’t a threshold to you? What is, aside of duplicating a Rwanda-like genocide? ]


5,000 Chinese demonstrators is small change compared to 100,000 GI’s in Korea and Vietnam, and tens of millions of Chinese dead in massacres and famines. The basic point is that Bush ignored it for a number of reasons, one of which was the possibility of back-sliding by Russia - the US was at least nominally allied with China against the Soviet Union, another of which was the possibility of something similar to the Soviet collapse playing out in China a little later.


38 posted on 11/27/2019 7:03:00 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

- There were more than 5,000 “demonstraters” in Tiananmen Square
- China had negligible involvement in Vietnam, as Vietnam is their arch enemy
- Korea? Really a historical anomaly. It’s not a catalyst to why we are in the position we’re in though. So blame goes to GHWB for not being tough on China after the T-Square massacre.


39 posted on 11/27/2019 7:10:34 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (20 FReepin' years of Freakin' FReeping!!! FReep yeah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Good point.

Moreover the Chinese have been interfering in us elections since Clinton but that is fine because it helps democrats win.


40 posted on 11/27/2019 8:03:58 PM PST by lonestar67 (America is exceptional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson