Posted on 11/23/2019 4:53:21 PM PST by hsmomx3
A lawyer for an indicted associate of Rudy Giuliani tells CNN that his client is willing to tell Congress about meetings the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee had in Vienna last year with a former Ukrainian prosecutor to discuss digging up dirt on Joe Biden.
The attorney, Joseph A. Bondy, represents Lev Parnas, the recently indicted Soviet-born American who worked with Giuliani to push claims of Democratic corruption in Ukraine. Bondy said that Parnas was told directly by the former Ukrainian official that he met last year in Vienna with Rep. Devin Nunes.
(Excerpt) Read more at abc15.com ...
Good point.
Why it was just a couple of days ago that Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman WASN'T referred to as being "Soviet born".
Rat Talking Point: Digging up dirt.
So....where's the dirt? Don't keep us waiting.
Bondy didn't just say that Parnas was told.
He said that Parnas was told directly.
That makes it 10% less hearsay, as it was a 'direct told' as opposed to an 'unspecified told.'. Also he didn't say that he was 'presumably told' nor that he 'assumed he was told', no no, he was 'told directly.'
This is a very serious and a very direct telling; I'm sure I don't have to tell you. But I am telling you directly.
Someone must tell Trump directly. Not posthaste and nor on the double, but directly. Telling Trump immediately or even forthwith is insufficient too. Again, he must be told in the manner in which Bondy said that Parnas was told, and that telling was direct. Lickety split and quickly are completely out the door. Three shall be the counting of the grenade, and the telling of Trump that the direct telling of Parnas by the prosecutor of the meeting of the Nunes with the likeness of the prosecutor shall be told to CNN that the telling of the direct telling could be to congress.
is that all you can find on Nunes? and there is something wrong with that?
why dont you go after all that bunch of corrupt x gov officials.. there is plenty there to work with..
The phrase “digging up dirt” is ubiquitous in the media on this story. Why isn’t it described as “fact finding”? Is it a phrase that has been poll-tested by the Democrats and fed to the media?
Why the heck are you directing your anger at me?
I posted this because it’s from my local news and I am the type that likes to know what is going on not be blinded.
Geesh get over yourself and take your huffing and puffing elsewhere.
"That's some grenade, that Holy Handgrenade!"
I kind of ignore this stuff, because on Twitter, you get the mainstream Media's take on stuff like this, which leaves out any salient facts.
“Digging up dirt” was the phrase used by Schiff to incorrectly quote Trump until the transcript was released.
Since when is investigating felonies equated to “digging up dirt”?
“...for an indicted associate of Rudy Giuliani”
This right there is what we call credibility. Yes sirree Bob. A trustworthy comrade in arms if ever there was one.
Not.
Anything involving Vienna is bull, and that includes Schubert.
I think people are going to be realy surprised when we actually learn why Giuliani went to Ukraine and what his mission accomplished......
I think people are going to be realy surprised when we actually learn why Giuliani went to Ukraine and what his mission accomplished......
I think people are going to be realy surprised when we actually learn why Giuliani went to Ukraine and what his mission accomplished......
It is really VERY SIMPLE why Giuliani went to Ukraine, there is not ONE DAMN person in the entire CESSPOOL of DC that Trump could trust to get to the bottom of the corruption!!!!
It’s not about trust....it’s about what he was exactly there for that has not been revealed by giuliani himself. we will ‘see’ the results soon I think.
Isn’t it interesting that the Congress and the media think it is illegal to look for evidence of the crimes of Democrat Politicians, but they don’t mind at all when Democrats COMMIT the crimes.
Yet at the same time, the mere rumor of a rumor of a Republican merely doing something that a Democrat doesn’t like, even if it is not actually a crime or malfeasance, is a hanging offense.
It was not to you.. sorry .. it was to the other side.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.