The whistleblower, according to the ICIG, believed that “much of the information provided by him/her at the time of the urgent concern disclosure has now been overcome by more detailed information coming out in the press, or recent text message releases, which are beyond his/her original knowledge. Some of the dates of information being disclosed in the news do not match up with Complainant’s urgent concern disclosure.”
Am I reading that right
Yes. And he is going to have to throw people under the bus..as in name who told him the “urgent” information
I read it the same way.
This is what they do. Put in a complaint th a t is not really an issue but in the following investigation they hope to uncover something real that they can use. That is why I thought no one should give this sham the time of day. Mud sticks and some may be convinced h e is guilty but he somehow got away with it. The Senate having a majority of Republicans fits that narrative for them. Still they have done such an appalling job that it seems that it is they who are now on trial.
Yep. The whistleblower’s secondhand information (from Vindman) was wrong. But I guess the changing of the guidelines allowing other than firsthand information immediately prior or perhaps afterwards of the filing the complaint was just a coincidence.
The whistleblower (leaker) knows his time in the barrel is fast approaching. Now is the time for some revisionist history. Schiff must be pulling the strings again.
He read the transcript
It sure looks that way.
yeah the information he put in the complaint doesn’t match the transcript-he was a useful idiot in the coup attempt and wants out after starting the whole thing...
his excuse of not checking the box is not credible
i dont trust the icig looks complicit to me
need more info on the 8 and 18th info...