Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live Thread - Impeachment Inquiry Hearings 11/21/2019
PBS ^ | November 21, 2019

Posted on 11/21/2019 6:00:09 AM PST by maggief

Fiona Hill, former National Security Council senior director for Europe and Russia, will testify before the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday, Nov. 21, in the impeachment probe into President Donald Trump. Hill told lawmakers in closed-door testimony last month that then-national security adviser John Bolton expressed concerns that the Trump administration was trying to pressure Ukrainian officials. The focus of the impeachment inquiry is a July 25 phone call in which Trump asked Ukraine's president to investigate 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden.

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 116th; couppeachmenthearing; fraublucher; heil; ignoringthevoters; impeachment; livecouppeachment; noaccountability; noloyalty; schiff; seditioncentral; soros; trump; trumpukraine; ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 941-953 next last
To: McGavin999

When Trump is re-elected they will all be gone.


681 posted on 11/21/2019 11:51:21 AM PST by pnut22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies]

To: pnut22

I know Zenia...I lived for three years in Troy. I agree about Dayton.....it’s very dark.


682 posted on 11/21/2019 11:51:31 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

I can’t believe any of the people are able to return to their jobs. What a bunch of rats.


683 posted on 11/21/2019 11:52:05 AM PST by whatexit (What a shame that New England has become Old England)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies]

To: Williams

The only diplomat that appeared to be professional in all these hearings was Ambassador Volker. He understood the President’s issues and did not have a problem working with Rudy and others to work them out to the positive conclusion that was met, aid to Ukraine and the President coming around to believing in the Ukraine’s new leadership.


684 posted on 11/21/2019 11:52:09 AM PST by snippy_about_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

To: rainee
Ask her what time it is & she’ll tell you how to build a clock

_________

rofl

685 posted on 11/21/2019 11:52:09 AM PST by a little elbow grease (... to err is human, to admit it divine ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 672 | View Replies]

To: caww

It’s very democrat. That says it all


686 posted on 11/21/2019 11:52:22 AM PST by pnut22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies]

To: pnut22

stefanik up


687 posted on 11/21/2019 11:53:13 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: rainee
Elise Stefanik is up!

She says these proceedings "reek". She's right.

________

688 posted on 11/21/2019 11:54:26 AM PST by a little elbow grease (... to err is human, to admit it divine ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: caww

It’s my strong impression that English women, with the exceptions of Diana Riggs and Elizabeth Hurley, have a frightening lack of sex appeal. Is that germaine to impeachment?


689 posted on 11/21/2019 11:54:31 AM PST by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant.2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies]

To: Williams
The problem is the 'career bureaucrats' (big governvent leaning) want to control every aspect of Ukraine and how our president should conduct US policy toward Ukraine as though our President cannot establish his own relationships with Country leaders.
690 posted on 11/21/2019 11:55:01 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease

She’s being filibustered on what should have been a simple “no” answer.


691 posted on 11/21/2019 11:55:34 AM PST by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant.2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 688 | View Replies]

To: Williams

My thoughts exactly. Holmes wasn’t present nor in the loop for any Trump/Putin meeting, he has no way of knowing if it was good, bad or neutral regarding Ukraine. He is making an assumption based on what is being said by other ignorants and/or what he wants to believe, which is the theme of this entire inquiry.


692 posted on 11/21/2019 11:55:41 AM PST by Moonlighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Maybe it explains Prince Andrew.


693 posted on 11/21/2019 11:55:48 AM PST by MustKnowHistory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 689 | View Replies]

To: whatexit

They will return, but will likely be shunned because people will be watching to see who they interact with.


694 posted on 11/21/2019 11:56:08 AM PST by McGavin999 (“Look into it” does not mean dig up dirt, it means find the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 683 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

lol


695 posted on 11/21/2019 11:56:12 AM PST by a little elbow grease (... to err is human, to admit it divine ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 679 | View Replies]

To: william clark
They may not have the time to try to change the rule retroactively. The hearings are supposed to end today, which is why Nunes filed his request today. According to the rule, the request must be made while the hearing is in progress.

I don't think Pelosi will have the time to schedule a House debate and then the vote, since the Republicans have the right to invoke the rule now.

But, anything is possible in Pelosi's "Wheelhouse."

-PJ

696 posted on 11/21/2019 11:56:14 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 670 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

They needed to ask her yes or no questions, Ms. Hill takes all their minutes away by yammering ón and on.


697 posted on 11/21/2019 11:56:23 AM PST by snippy_about_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies]

To: pnut22

When our guys are questioning, they say things like, “I know you’re upset that Trump won.” Why do they never ask, “Don’t you understand that we hated Obama with the burning heat of a thousand suns? Don’t you know we were physically ill when he won the election? But we’re American adults, and we respected an election and never did what you’re doing.”

These people truly don’t get it.


698 posted on 11/21/2019 11:56:43 AM PST by MayflowerMadam ("I've read the back of The Book, and we win.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: pnut22

When our guys are questioning, they say things like, “I know you’re upset that Trump won.” Why do they never ask, “Don’t you understand that we hated Obama with the burning heat of a thousand suns? Don’t you know we were physically ill when he won the election? But we’re American adults, and we respected an election and never did what you’re doing.”

These people truly don’t get it.


699 posted on 11/21/2019 11:56:43 AM PST by MayflowerMadam ("I've read the back of The Book, and we win.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: Williams

They look frigid, Jim.


700 posted on 11/21/2019 11:56:45 AM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 689 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 941-953 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson