Who appointed this judge, anyway? The article didn't say.
Will the Republicrats ever be willing to fight this much and this intensely?
PING!
What’s the problem here???
In alphabetical order, GOP comes before ‘Rat.
You could guess and have a 95% chance of being right....bammy appointed.
If you are an undecided voter then this may make a difference. If you are still undecided by Nov 2020, you probably shouldn’t be voting, and are probably guessing. IMHO
So, the judge is saying that voters will automatically tend to vote for the name that appears first? Or that voters are too lazy to read both names? Or that it’s too hard to vote for the name that appears second? Or that the order of the names implies some sort of ranking system? Or?
Obama. Not hard to find. All you have to do is Google his name. Takes about a minute.
A travesty of justice.
States can list candidates in any order they wish.
Ballot order does make a difference. This has been understood from time immemorial. If I had any confidence that a neutral rule would be adopted and applied impartially, I would say fine. But … the moment the democrats have complete control in Florida, they will move to reinstitute the preference for the governor’s party. They will probably do so on the grounds that a rotating system is confusing to voters. And an activist judge will agree. The rule in play here is not neutrality. The rule is that whatever the democrats want to game the system for themselves will be awarded by a judge.
I think the incumbent should be listed first.
Didn’t the Supreme Court refuse to take up gerrymandering because it was not their place to interfere in state politics?
If this gets to SCOTUS, look for a similar ruling.
WTF does this really have an effect on? Pick your battles carefully I say and don’t waste time/resources on petty BS like this.
Does this judge support the prosecution of voter fraud?
Obama - who else but an Obama judge would involve the court in blatantly political decisions at this level. I’m appalled at the level of corruption of the mind and the law his appointees have have carried with them..
Why doesn’t the GOP fight like this?
Not a big deal...IMHO
Someone has to be first. Why are the rats first?
How about a law that only provides the names of the candidates only and not the party?
That would really shake things up.
The previous occupant of the White House. The bias that these Leftist judges show is getting unbearable.
Trump
Warren
It seems Trump would still be listed first
Are the Democrats going to raise the same fight in New York, on principle?
(Heh. "Principle." That word's not in the Progressive glossary.)