Posted on 11/15/2019 4:34:53 AM PST by Textide
Who was she loyal to when she was serving under 3 different Republican presidents? I think Reagan, Bush I and Bush II.
However Shiff is focused on the publics “perception” not the facts or he would not be talking this much in the inquiry in order to feed the public his ‘designed’ frame up.
He doesn't care about facts because his purpose is to keep this inquery drama ‘alive’ for the media to spin as long as possible....and they are complicit with the Dems to keep it going. Schiff = Fabricated Inquirey = Voter Doubt
..Which goes back to the Garden when satan said to Eve...."Has God not said?"......It is the tactic of the enemy of God against truth..it's seldom an outright lie, rather to cause Doubt.
The average American certainly doesn’t care about the 17,000 Ukraine citizens who have already died in this little border action. They cared a lot more about the 3,000 Americans who died on 9/11. Comparing our population with Ukraine’s 42 million means proportionally if the Ukraine were our size it would be over 130,000 already killed by Russian action.
Rebuilding the GOP??? You must be on the good stuff. If Trump falls, there will be no rebuilding the GOP or the country. The tidal wave of open borders, amnesty for all and free everything will crush the country and turn it into something that we will never recover from.
I gotta ask you. What is wrong with dirt under fingernails?
I gotta ask you. What is wrong with dirt under fingernails?
Has the fact there actually was a phone call been verified? My gut feeling is that could well be another fabricated event. Also who is the “staff” member who heard the POTUS and why isn’t that person testifying?
99.9% of all State Department employees are only loyal to themselves and instilling collectivist policies that promote “regionalism”. If you mention one hint of American ideals you will not get hired within that Department.
2019 - 33 = 1996. Served under Repubs of Bush Jr. and Trump. As I said before her early track has been scrubbed which could mean “intelligence”. This lady did make a no-prosecution list (6 on record despite what was said in the hearing) which got her canned, meaning she was in on protecting certain elements of possible anti-Trump shenanigans/protecting certain corruption she favored.
Only reason she was not cross-examined harder is Repubs had bigger fish to fry and they way this impeachment inquiry is designed to be a one-sided affair.
Her years starting under the Foreign Service started under Reagan, but that was a “grooming” exercise. Again, with her knowledge of Russia probably intelligence since again, that phase was scrubbed.
Who knows rollo tomasi. She was an obama ambassador and may be following the democrat line. Who knows? But she was asked to come home for her protection, from the little quip I picked up on. The President? Again, who knows. He’s My President, I backed him in 2016 and I’ll back him again. He’s doing a fantastic job for America and Americans.
I’m one who keeps my ear to the ground...sometimes I get fire ants, sometimes interesting things.
One last thing, because Pres. Trump expresses United States ideals and is against “regionalism” which has been the policy for over 60 years, he causes great wailing and knashing of teeth among State Department careerist. The targeting against this man will not stop.
Why was she fired (Not come back home since that whole episode was sensationalized, it’s a quasi-war zone after all )?
Who knows rollo tomasi. People in the d.c. area don’t think like we, in the fly over country. We just need to keep our ears to the ground and hope for the best.
Rudy says he has 5 witness that will come forward in person (not anonymously) and go on the record to testify against Yoko.
The Ukrainians referred to the Embassy as “Hillary Campaign Headquarters”.
The RATs dragged her in...now they should all go down.
She might wind up teaching her fellow bull-dykes in a federal prison.
One of the things that is brought up in these hearings as if it is a normal routine job of American diplomats is their involvement in routing out corruption (whatever that means) in other countries.
Why is it US govt business to root out corruption in foreign lands?
What business is it of the USA’s State Dept Mandarins that my Greek cousin gets out of traffic violations by bribing the local constabulary?
Are these foreign countries no sovereign? Or are they really colonies of the American empire? If your tribunes are involved in local politics - you are an empire.
I agree with one caveat.
If it’s American money that is being corruptly funneled back to crooked U.S. politicians then it is in our interests to root out the illegal activity.
My guess (only a guess) is that part of their job is to ensure that the foreign aid that we generously give is only used for its intended purposes.
I don’t think she’ll look very good in orange!
Depends on the source of the “dirt”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.