Posted on 11/15/2019 4:34:53 AM PST by Textide
Live thread for today's round of the House Impeachment Hearing starring Marie "happy face" Yovanovitch.
Link to Nov 13th thread on FR.
seems like he was saying that this operation has different rules and nunes was not allowed..i guess because schiff is in charge of the rules
Press no longer even cares if they appear to report facts, any longer.
USSR yellow journOlists.
It’s apparent she well knew her “job” was at risk for sometime beforehand...she’s now trying to justify why it should not have been.
They have NOTHING!
Lets recapitulate: Democrats have no perp, no crime and no victim.
Todays testimony didnt change that underlying fact and it didnt move the country to back impeachment.
I wonder how long the main networks will continue to preempt their regular programming. Ratings must be horrible. This certainly is not Must See TV. Boring and waste of time.
But, she was fired! And apparently there were people that wanted her fired. Surely that should count for SOMETHING!
That and pi$$
And racist, too, according to Chuck Schumer.
-PJ
She is a witness to nothing. She is no more than a disgruntled EX-employee.
She just gave Judicial Watch grounds to pound DOS for more extensive FOIA requests...
Anybody in an appointed position knows when the tide is turning!
Amigo is not a slur and never was. It simply means friend. But the Dems can turn on the political correctness machine over anything at any time.
Yeah, I think the Republican’s game plan was to have Stefanik ask the tough questions, but counsel to bore the pants off everyone if not.
It’s really techno-bureaucrat talk and boring as all hell.
Yep. I keep asking myself why this woman is being questioned. I mean, if it is to build a case for something else, great, but I didn’t see that “something else” when the D’s wrapped up questioning.
Yep. I keep asking myself why this woman is being questioned. I mean, if it is to build a case for something else, great, but I didn’t see that “something else” when the D’s wrapped up questioning.
She has a severe case of cannotletgoitis from Hillary.
Agreed she is disgruntled and the RATS are using her!
Good point!
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2005/09/15/liberalism_illuminated_by_hearings/
Schumer starts out praising Roberts intellects and then lists one of his cons, and you will hear Schumer say that Roberts lacks compassion because he used the word amigo in the 1980s.
SCHUMER: First is the question of compassion and humanity. I said on the first days of these hearings its important to determine not just the quality of your mind, but the fullness of your heart, which to I think a good number of us at least on both sides of the aisle, really, mean the ability to truly empathize with those who are less fortunate and who often need the protections of the government and the assistance of the law to have any chance at all. It didnt seem much, for instance, to concede that the wording, illegal amigos was unfortunate. Yet you refused to say so. America has moved in the 21st Century beyond what Senator Kennedy called the cramped view of civil rights professed in the early Reagan administration. But you wouldnt admit now, in 2005, that any of those views you argued for in the early eighties were misguided, with the hindsight of history. Thats troubling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.