Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ethics panel investigating Rep. Hastings over relationship with staffer
The Hill ^ | 11 14 2019 | Cristina Marcos

Posted on 11/14/2019 3:58:18 PM PST by yesthatjallen

The House Ethics Committee revealed on Thursday that it is investigating Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.) over whether his relationship with a member of his staff breaks House rules.

Hastings has admitted to being in a relationship with his aide, Patricia Williams, who serves as his deputy district director.

The committee is now investigating whether Hastings violated House rules with that relationship and if he received any improper gifts from that employee.

The House last year adopted a rule preventing members of Congress from having a sexual relationship with a member of their staff.

"The Committee is aware of public allegations arising out of Representative Alcee Hastings’ personal relationship with an individual employed in his congressional office," House Ethics Committee Chairman Ted Deutch (D-Fla.) and the panel's ranking Republican, Rep. Kenny Marchant (Texas), said in a joint statement, without identifying the staffer.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: alceehastings; cristinamarcos; florida; hastings; kennymarchant; patriciawilliams; teddeutch; texas; thehill; thehillary; theshill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 11/14/2019 3:58:18 PM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

He’s 83 years old and banging the help????

EWWWWW


2 posted on 11/14/2019 3:59:43 PM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

That’s racist.


3 posted on 11/14/2019 4:01:23 PM PST by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy
He’s 83 years old and banging the help????
EWWWWW

DITTO!

4 posted on 11/14/2019 4:02:57 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Oh the impeached guy who wrote the impeachment rules for Trump’s impeachment ,LOL


5 posted on 11/14/2019 4:03:53 PM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Perhaps the lowest and most brazen scumbag in the Congress.


6 posted on 11/14/2019 4:04:45 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

Wrinkled and everything...

I just threw up in my mouth...


7 posted on 11/14/2019 4:05:07 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Trump didnÂ’t want an AG, he wanted a consigliere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

>>>if he received any improper gifts from that employee<<<

Sounds more like Barter than a Gift.

Kamaltoe “Headboard” Harris got a No Show $75,000 a Year Job and all she had do is what comes naturally.


8 posted on 11/14/2019 4:06:12 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (Kill a Commie for your Mommy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“Improper gifts,” is that they call it these days?


9 posted on 11/14/2019 4:06:44 PM PST by KevinB ("Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." - Charles Darwin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

WOW and EWWWWW


10 posted on 11/14/2019 4:06:52 PM PST by forgotten man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

He’s 83 years old and banging the help????
EWWWWW

Hey! Who does she think she is, Kamala Harris?


11 posted on 11/14/2019 4:08:10 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
Wrinkled and everything...
I just threw up in my mouth..

Now, now, there HAS to be some 90-year-old woman who would just LOVE to cuddle up with a "younger" man. They could MELT into each other's wrinkles. :o)

12 posted on 11/14/2019 4:09:00 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tet68
He’s 83 years old and banging the help????
EWWWWW
Hey! Who does she think she is, Kamala Harris?

He's probably paying a $BUNDLE$ for the cuddle-time.

13 posted on 11/14/2019 4:11:10 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

What do you expect from a former Fed Judge who was impeached and convicted for bribery!


14 posted on 11/14/2019 4:12:21 PM PST by SecondAmendment (This just proves my latest theory ... LEFTISTS RUIN EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Isn’t Ilhan Omar involved with a staffer?


15 posted on 11/14/2019 4:14:12 PM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Brought up on ethics charges in the past and he still can’t keep it in his pants


16 posted on 11/14/2019 4:14:41 PM PST by Impala64ssa (Virtue signalling is no virtue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen; shelterguy; bkopto; butlerweave; Wally_Kalbacken; gov_bean_ counter; ...
For anyone who forgets how The Swamp works, and why they all need to be decorating the DC cherry trees for Trumpmas this year:

In 1981, Hastings was charged with accepting a $150,000 bribe in exchange for a lenient sentence and a return of seized assets for 21 counts of racketeering by Frank and Thomas Romano, and of perjury in his testimony about the case. In 1983, Hastings was acquitted by a jury after his alleged co-conspirator, William Borders, refused to testify in court, resulting in a jail sentence for Borders.

In 1988, the Democratic-controlled United States House of Representatives took up the case, and Hastings was impeached for bribery and perjury by a vote of 413–3. He was then convicted on October 20, 1989, by the United States Senate, becoming the sixth federal judge in the history of the United States to be removed from office by the Senate. The Senate, in two hours of roll calls, voted on 11 of the 17 articles of impeachment. It convicted Hastings of eight of the 11 articles. The vote on the first article was 69 for and 26 opposed.

Alleged co-conspirator attorney William Borders went to jail again for refusing to testify in the impeachment proceedings, but was later given a full pardon by President Bill Clinton on his last day in office.

Hastings filed suit in federal court claiming that his impeachment trial was invalid because he was tried by a Senate committee, not in front of the full Senate, and that he had been acquitted in a criminal trial. Judge Stanley Sporkin ruled in favor of Hastings, remanding the case to the Senate, but stayed his ruling pending the outcome of an appeal to the Supreme Court in a similar case regarding Judge Walter Nixon, who had also been impeached and removed.

Sporkin found some "crucial distinctions" between Nixon's case and Hastings's – specifically, that Nixon had been convicted criminally, and that Hastings was not found guilty by two-thirds of the committee who actually "tried" his impeachment in the Senate. He added that Hastings had a right to trial by the full Senate.

The Supreme Court, however, ruled in Nixon v. United States that the federal courts have no jurisdiction over Senate impeachment matters, so Sporkin's ruling was vacated and Hastings's conviction and removal were upheld.


17 posted on 11/14/2019 4:14:55 PM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

“83 years old and banging the help????’

Viagra, not just for breakfast, anymore.


18 posted on 11/14/2019 4:15:23 PM PST by dynachrome (Build the wall, deport them all. And send her back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
From back in June ...
Kamala Harris picks up endorsement from influential Florida Rep. Alcee Hastings
19 posted on 11/14/2019 4:21:59 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“The House last year adopted a rule preventing members of Congress from having a sexual relationship with a member of their staff.”

Filthy democrats want to control your sex life...if you are lucky enough to have one these days.


20 posted on 11/14/2019 4:23:35 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson