Posted on 11/14/2019 1:09:52 PM PST by MarvinStinson
“Andrew Weissmann, a former Justice Department official who was known as Mueller’s “pitbull” during the Russia investigation, made his debut Wednesday as an NBC News legal analyst.”
Best item in his resume is putting 4 innocent guys in jail , where two of them died, and all their convictions were overturned and Weisman was for guilty of ‘withholding exculpatory evidence” This guy, and Mueller, both POS
Unethical excrement! Tar and feathering would be appropriate for this clown! He is the reason for Trump..
lol
Translation: “Stop looking at Ukraine!”
More of the Russia hoax BS from the guy who peddled it for nearly three years,
Who said Jews and Muslims can’t get along?...
I’m not a shyster lawyer BUT I’ll give the DIMocRATS some advice IF they want ANY chance of their party SURVIVING as a major party after 2021: DROP this STUPID investigation NOW, have the DNC return the 50+ million dollars to the Treasury, BLAME it on Pelosi, Schiff, Waters & a few other LUNATICS/POWER-HUNGRY “leaders” & RESIGN from your congressional seat w/o delay.
Yours, TMN78247
(HAT TIP Qaz123)
Their opening statements should have been something like this......
I’m a career radical Leftist who worked under both Clintons and Obama.....a high-paid govt employee with several pensions that hates the United States, who has never done one thing to advance the interests of the United States.
Like my role models the Clintons and Obama, I’ve used my position to enrich my liberal friends, receive kickbacks and given away US taxpayer money to despots, tyrants and corrupt foreign governments without any accountability.
I have spent my professional career working overseas on the taxpayer dime, spending most of it getting drunk. I, nor any of my colleagues have ever cared about what any administration has wanted, except the Democratic Presidents, because ultimately we, the unelected and anonymous bureaucrats at State, control American Foreign policy.
We know it all and do it all. We do not care what anyone else thinks except Democrat Presidents and liberal foreign policy think tanks because that’s how we all skim money.
Anything I say here today is my liberal-biased opinion and interpretation of the situation even though I was not privy to the call, nor did I speak with anyone that was.
Everything I will share with you today is based on a conversation I had with someone in the lunchroom, who heard it from someone else, so I cannot actually attest to any facts. I can only attest to the many dog whistles I think I heard and my current emotional state.
.......ahem ahem ahem.....oops.....wrong script......
What I meant to say is.....
As a career Foreign Service Officer/Diplomat for the US Dept of State, although I do not agree with the foreign policy set forth by the current administration, I am here to testify to the committee on what I know. Even though everything I know is hearsay and from open source news outlets.”
The Democrats need to tread lightly when it comes to accusations of interferring with elections. They know their interference in the 2016 election is about to become front page news. (That's if the FISA report is ever released!)
If ever there was a person that deserved the blessing of the fig tree, it is Weissmann.
WOW.
Quite an overwhelming list.
Weissmann had YEARS to twist the legal system to "get" Trump - and he couldn't do it, even as a nakedly-partisan Democrat.
I'm going to encourage more analogies to Enemy At The Gates, myself...
This guy is literally right up there with Soros.
Staying true to leftist form, they would kill and eat their own children, to end liberty in America, end Israel, and spread and strengthen the grip of global socialism/totalitarianism.
If there is ever a person that needs to be hung, shot and tarred and feathered all at once, dirty filthy scumbag
Yes, and that’s only a partial list. The evidence is overwhelming, to say the least.
This fleabag should be far, far away even if the people speak Portoguese. What language do the Martians use.
...Sondland and an aide to Taylor, David Holmes, who allegedly heard Trump on the call, could claim under oath that he said this, and the president “can’t rebut it” unless he suddenly says he recalls the conversation.
_____________________________________________________
IDK....couldn’t the POTUS release a transcript and then could anyone sue the 2 witnesses for, oh, say: PERJURY?
In other words, they have already decided to overturn the election; they just need to find the right crime to accuse President Trump of in their agreed narrative.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.