Posted on 11/14/2019 1:09:52 PM PST by MarvinStinson
One of special counsel Robert Mueller's top prosecutors is offering advice to House Democrats for their impeachment proceedings against President Trump.
Andrew Weissmann, a former Justice Department official who was known as Mueller's "pitbull" during the Russia investigation, made his debut Wednesday as an NBC News legal analyst.
He explained how the House Democrats faltered in their first day of public hearings and should refocus their proceedings from Ukraine to United States election interference if they want to make an effective case against Trump.
"The key thing that the Democrats have to think about is, where are you going to be at the end? What is it that you’re going to be asking people to really care about? And you need to find out — and make the case for — why should there be impeachment where people vote to convict as opposed to acquit now, and not sort of let it go to the election?" Weissmann said on MSNBC.
He said Democrats "needed to focus on that this was about election interference in our election" and encouraged more analogies to the Watergate scandal that led to President Richard Nixon's resignation.
During an earlier appearance on NBC News, Weissmann also critiqued the Republicans' performance during the House Intelligence Committee hearing on Wednesday. Claiming the facts were not on their side, Weissmann said GOP lawmakers "raised a lot of confusion" as a defense counsel might do in a criminal case under similar circumstances.
Impeachment proceedings were touched off by a whistleblower complaint about a July 25 phone call in which Trump urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to look into a conspiracy theory regarding CrowdStrike. He also urged him to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden's business dealings in Ukraine. The elder Biden is a leading candidate for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination.
One of the witnesses who testified on Wednesday, acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor, said he was told military aid to Ukraine was contingent on Ukraine publicly announcing these investigations. The congressionally mandated security assistance, meant to counter Russian aggression, was eventually given to Ukraine, but only after lawmakers complained and the whistleblower complaint was submitted to the Intelligence Community inspector general. The president claims he urged Ukraine to open the investigations to root out corruption in Ukraine.
"It's telling that he said it's really important that it be public," Weissmann said. "I don't really care whether you do the investigation. What's important is it be a public announcement of the investigation," he added.
Trump told reporters on Wednesday he does not recall a July 26 phone call with European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland, another impeachment witness, in which he was said to have asked about "the investigations."
Weissmann said this could be a "huge mistake" for Trump because Sondland and an aide to Taylor, David Holmes, who allegedly heard Trump on the call, could claim under oath that he said this, and the president "can't rebut it" unless he suddenly says he recalls the conversation.
I think Pitbull’s bark worse than his bite.
They should just subpoena the cell phone and see if there was a call to Trump. Easy Peazy. and while you have the phone..
If you have to refocus your case, then it must not be too compelling a case to begin with.
This is the ONE PERSON who personifies the reason that tens of MILLIONS of Americans think that the federal government is nothing more than a bunch of jack-booted thugs. He should have been FIRED (or at least demoted) YEARS AGO, given his history, but no - he gets a prime position to participate in the (attempted) coup against Trump.
If the federal government CANNOT rid themselves of political operatives in positions of trust that are intended to be non-political, then it’s difficult to condemn what, inevitably, results from this lack of accountability.
He was just an impartial and fair Justice Department investigator, yessirree.
he media thinks they were great, where's the disconnect?
Best advice to him is don’t try it.
With Andie’s track record . . .
She should keep her big mouth shut
I get all my news from Weissmann and Brennan.
What a jackass. Weissmann couldn't even do this after his own two-year investigation, despite an endless parade of Democrat @ssholes -- including Pencil-Neck Schiff himself -- getting on TV and swearing up and down that they had evidence of Trump colluding with the Russians to "hack" the 2016 election.
I’m sure it’s minor compared to the advise he’s given Harvey Weinstein over the years!
“Election interference”
Like the opposition candidate paying for the “Steele Dossier”? Like hiring Perkins Coie law firm to hide payments? Exonerating Her Heinous for a multitude of provable crimes? Like ginning up fake FISA warrants? Like working for three years to overturn a fair election because you didn’t like the results? Like enlisting the Brits, Italians and Aussies to overturn the election?
Interference like that?
In an impeachment, Weissman does not have all the tools he is used to using in his prosecutions.
1. He cannot hold the President in solitary confinement awaiting trial.
2. He cannot demand a plea while witholding exculpatory evidence.
3. He cannot “cut a deal” with witnesses, demanding they create evidence to save their skins.
4. He cannot threaten to prosecute the Trump family if the President does not resign.
5. In short, his ability for corrupt prosecution is greatly diminished.
The least ethical prosecutor in America has weighed in! Huzzah!
Weissmann ran the Mueller investigation and we saw how that turned out.
In an impeachment, Weissman does not have all the tools he is used to using in his prosecutions.
1. He cannot hold the President in solitary confinement awaiting trial.
2. He cannot demand a plea while witholding exculpatory evidence.
3. He cannot “cut a deal” with witnesses, demanding they create evidence to save their skins.
4. He cannot threaten to prosecute the Trump family if the President does not resign.
5. In short, his ability for corrupt prosecution is greatly diminished.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.