Summary:
Millie and her co-host, a female member of the the US Army (maybe former member but very improessive) had a real whistleblower insider dump on them anonymously thousands and thousands of documents, emails, texts, retrieved discarded materials that show clearly how the fraud against Bevin IS A DRY RUN FOR 2020, that Trump can’t be beat at the polls so they have to cheat and are all in to do it.
The insider info is astounding and they can’t divulge most of it for liability and legal reasons. They described how James O’Keefe of Project Veritas had a skirmish with lawyers and the law when he penetrated vote fraud a while back.
Millie and her co-host were at a loss of how to get the data dump to Bevin but couldn’t find a trusted link to get it there (this was 3 days ago). They called local law enforcement but the officer they talked to was retarded and likely susceptible to take the evidence and it would be gone.
So a few days ago they were in a quandary as the information names names, companies, bank accounts, bankers, the whole nine yards, everything. It showed clearly how they got the illegal votes to put Bevin under.
Bevin lost by about 4000 votes out of about 1,500,000 cast. Yet down ballot Republicans kicked ass and won by a large margins like 30%-40% in races where hundreds of thousands of votes were cast.
Many were saying Bevin ticked off voters but that is BS. He may have ticked some off but not enough to sway voters who voted straight GOP all except for Bevin when they decided to vote for the Democrat who they knew was a snake. And there was a record number of votes so it doesn’t add up.
Amazing how fast the "debunkers" swing into action when there's a vote fraud story afloat.
I just realized that it's the same exact reaction every time from what we now know is DEMOCRAT Media (thanks to President Trump).
Meanwhile, the Democrat Media NEVER investigates vote fraud - because it's like unicorns or the Philosopher's Stone. 
Their informant supplied bank records demonstrating suspicious payments from foreign sources to the company that supplied all the voting machines and tally equipment for the election.
They also had computer logs which appeared to show regular processes that ran in the machines and transferred vote totals from one candidate to another while keeping the summaries balanced.
They said they were going to duplicate the materials and send copies to every member of Congress. If that happened, there has not been a ripple of noise about it.
I am not sure they really have what they claim, but if they do, they have already sat on it too long. They had better watch their backs.
Does real, tangible, incontrovertible evidence exist that will hold up in a court of law?
Or is this simply vague claims of alleged impropriety which need to be investigated?
Because if it's the latter, it will go nowhere.