Does real, tangible, incontrovertible evidence exist that will hold up in a court of law?
Or is this simply vague claims of alleged impropriety which need to be investigated?
Because if it's the latter, it will go nowhere.
Likely the latter.
According to what they describe, it would most certainly be admissible in a court of law, the DOJ would have mountains of evidence to review and prosecute, if the right people in the DOJ were on it.
See #21 above flamberge regarding bank records. Those records according to the data described are but a minor part seeming form one point on a 24 point head. They alone could send those involved to prison for a decade plus.
Definitely there is enough probable cause and apparent hard evidence to nail the fraudsters to the wall.
Bevin is contesting the election, he still has a campaign organization. If they can get him the records, his staff can start organizing discovery and once they build a preliminary but potent case, they can call in the Feds because it’s more than just KY.
The problem is who at the federal level can be trusted with the intake?
You Republicans are real dummies.
Democrat judges have banned any proof of voter fraud while you sleep. Sleep, sleep, sleep.
You have no vlue what goes on.
Dummies.