To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Not being a chemist sort I’m wondering about the costs of the oxygen to liberate the hydrogen.
5 posted on
11/11/2019 8:35:00 PM PST by
rockinqsranch
("Democratic" party sold out to the ICP. It is now the Communist Party USA.)
To: rockinqsranch
11 posted on
11/11/2019 8:41:55 PM PST by
LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
(TRUMP TRAIN !!! Get the hell out of the way if you are not on yet because we don't stop for idiots)
To: rockinqsranch
There is a net loss, but it is a reality that energy production is a subsidized activity in the world to make the modern world possible and not send us back to the Stone age.
Thus could help lead to quenching the thirst of the deserts of the world and make the world bloom.
23 posted on
11/11/2019 9:16:10 PM PST by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death by cultsther)
To: rockinqsranch
What about adding the water vapor to the atmosphere when the hydrogen burns? Water vapor is 70 times worse than CO2
45 posted on
11/12/2019 12:43:03 AM PST by
willyd
(I for one welcome our NSA overlords)
To: rockinqsranch
Not being a chemist sort Im wondering about the costs of the oxygen to liberate the hydrogen.
'Free', actually. Assuming the scientists here are correct, the last line of the excerpt has the answer you seek:
Around 5% of the H2 produced then powers the oxygen production plant, so the system more than pays for itself.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson