Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AXIOS: Report: State Dept. found WH had no legal ground to block Ukraine aid
Axios ^ | 11-10-2019 | Orion Rummler

Posted on 11/10/2019 6:53:10 AM PST by tcrlaf

State Department lawyers found President Trump and the White House Office of Management and Budget had no legal ground to block the department sending military aid to Ukraine, Bloomberg reports.

What's happening: The State Department "quietly authorized releasing $141 million" of the approximately $400 million withheld by the White House several days before Sept. 11 — the date Trump says he released the funds, per Bloomberg.

The White House hold on funds "provoked consternation, if not panic, at the State and Defense Departments," Bloomberg reports — "because the law required them to spend the money by the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30 or lose it."

(Excerpt) Read more at axios.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2020election; axios; axiossux; bloomberg; corruption; deepstate; deepstateapproved; deepstatedepartment; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; election2020; mediawingofthednc; obamunism; orionrummler; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; smearmachine; ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
The implications are clear: The DEEP STATE bureaucracrats decide what is foriegn policy, and which US laws about giving money to corrupt countries they will follow, not the President.

So, which corrupt Ukrainian Billionaire needed the money so badly??

1 posted on 11/10/2019 6:53:10 AM PST by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

“So, which corrupt Ukrainian Billionaire needed the money so badly??”

The Democrat Party.

L


2 posted on 11/10/2019 6:54:16 AM PST by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Not that we could before, but now that Nanny Bloomers in in the race can we not dispense with his network?


3 posted on 11/10/2019 6:55:39 AM PST by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

What “legal ground” does Axios pretend is necessary to TEMPORARILY “block” aid?


4 posted on 11/10/2019 6:57:34 AM PST by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

So Trump couldn’t but Biden could?


5 posted on 11/10/2019 6:57:42 AM PST by IC Ken (Stop making stupid people famous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
...because the law required them to spend the money by the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30 or lose it."

Boom! And there it is. This is why government continues to grow unabated. That mindset needs to end.

6 posted on 11/10/2019 6:59:24 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would be have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Well, this ought to be easy to figure out. Had any previous President ever blocked foreign aid before?


7 posted on 11/10/2019 7:00:46 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would be have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

It’s illegal to NOT spend money???


8 posted on 11/10/2019 7:01:50 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would be have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Maybe it’s time to cut funding to State Department lawyers.


9 posted on 11/10/2019 7:02:39 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would be have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

The believe the GOP congress authorized military aid to Ukraine. Obama blocked it. I’m surprised nobody has mentioned that.


10 posted on 11/10/2019 7:02:47 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Sounds like the State Department thinks it has authority over the President, whom they serve.

He needs to fire the top 5 levels of the State Department immediately.


11 posted on 11/10/2019 7:02:53 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
Report: State Dept. found WH had no legal ground to block Ukraine aid

...which, by extension, also means that there was no legal ground NOT to block it.

What a stupid article.

12 posted on 11/10/2019 7:02:56 AM PST by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

All those kickbacks could be lost if there was further delay in giving the monies to Ukraine.

That’s what’s surfacing when you subtract the drama and BS.


13 posted on 11/10/2019 7:03:03 AM PST by romanesq (8Chan and its child porn, violence and murders are kaput. So is the QAnon grift with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IC Ken

and Hillary. Let’s not forget how her foundation became bigger than all the mafia crime families combined.

The deep state does not want Trump in the White House, not even as a tourist.


14 posted on 11/10/2019 7:03:34 AM PST by HypatiaTaught (Time to lock up "Let them eat Yellow Cake" Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

And a few tweets from Paul Ryan reminding the media of that would be devastating to the “Trump blocks aid” Dem narrative. But, obviously, Ryan plays for Team Democrat.


15 posted on 11/10/2019 7:04:11 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
The White House hold on funds "provoked consternation, if not panic, at the State and Defense Departments,"

Sheeeyit. I bet it did.

16 posted on 11/10/2019 7:04:26 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would be have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Isn’t the State Department part of the Executive branch?


17 posted on 11/10/2019 7:04:56 AM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

This makes absolutely no sense.

1. The State department is part of the executive branch. Therefore, the powers withing the State department come from the POTUS. The POTUS is in charge of all foreign negotiations and relationships. The POTUS is in charge of the military. The POTUS negotiates all treaties. Therefore, the POTUS decision who gets military and financial assistance via the State department. Therefore, the POTUS is the FINAL say unless congress has a signed a treaty.

2. Congress cannot force the POTUS to give funds via the State Department or any other portion of the Executive branch. This would be a violation of the separation of powers as outlined within the Constitution.

Thus, saying the POTUS has no right to stop the State Department from sending funds is akin to saying the State department is no longer part of the Executive branch of government. This can’t be. If it was so.....how could Biden withhold money to stop investigation of his son’s company.

The message is simple, we no longer have a Constitutional Republic, and we the people don’t matter anymore. Trump is right, the US government is no longer by the people.


18 posted on 11/10/2019 7:05:35 AM PST by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
There were two different funds...one for $250 mil and $141 mil.

Bolton is the one who knows what is going on more than anyone....and his testimony will HELP the President. That's why he wants a real subpeona and an open hearing.

Remember this is the first time Ukraine is getting more than blankets.

19 posted on 11/10/2019 7:06:15 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
The White House hold on funds "provoked consternation, if not panic, at the State and Defense Departments,"

That's all it takes to get State Department of panties all wadded up? Maybe it's time to abolish the State Department if it's that prone to hysteria.

20 posted on 11/10/2019 7:07:23 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would be have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson