These past few weeks he's really been harping on the apparent deep state connections of certain military officers. He also is exposing the intelligence agencies—at least those who are deep state.
It's a damn shame, too!
I did years of duty in intelligence agencies—DIA and NSA (thru US Air Force's Electronic Security Command) and the officers and civilians I knew were hard patriots consumed with defeating the Soviet and Communist menace.
After the Soviets fell, and especially when Clinton was president, I started to worry. Especially for the NSA, who seemed like they were searching for a new mission... I left that duty behind in 1997, but right before I left, they were all hyping up about cyber warfare. This was going to be the new cutting edge for them. I wasn't intel, I was comm-computers. Some of the crap they were spouting was really illegal, like spying on the people, businesses and what not. I remember the top NSA legal counsel had to come to our headquarters and basically chew them out for trying to listen in on certain Internet routers. Idiots!
The biggest problem for our military is not having a common enemy to train for war against. 9/11 was a new mission, but an elusive, civilian-based enemy that is hard to oppose through combined arms is too much of a temptation to apply skills learned to your own people.
Without a common enemy, a big bureaucratic military/government/police always turns on its own people.
Trump is exposing the entire spider web between the swamp and the media by having them shine the lights on themselves. Epstein shows how that connection works and who is the real villains.
So our military needs to focus on other organized military, but in order to combat ISIS, Al Queda, Antifa, the IRA, and other informal terror groups we need a flash-mob agency that can assemble and disband on a fluid basis? At first read, it sounds very Deep State.
Article questioning all those metals on Vindman’s chest: