[yesthatjallen]

The original NYT OP ED by Anonymous:

I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration

[DoughtyOne]

D E S P E R A T I O N !

Gotta keep the meme going.

Orange man bad, reason MMMCCLVI.

[scrabblehack]

Is it Joe Klein?

If outed can he be charged with cybercrimes? Libel? (When “Anonymous” accused Knoxville Mayor Madelyn Rogero of being in the KKK)?

[Lockbox]

“Ich bin ein Anonymous”?

[Don Corleone]

The Marxists are seeing all their ploys failing. They are now to the point of throwing anything at the Donald to see if they can get even a smidgen to stick. Their lust for POWER and domination knows no sanity or limits. It is a tactic such as this that has driven insurrections. Fort Sumter did not have to happen but by the time it did there was no alternative. I think that is what the Marxists want, massive disruption so they can step in and impose rule. We and the world are in dangerous times.

When you think of the numbers that have not a clue as to what is going on or do not care, well, God help us all.

[MomwithHope]

Probably screenwriter wannabe Schifty Schif.

[Steely Tom]

Of course, we all believe Anonymous, just like we believed Ballsey Ford and the porn star’s lawyer who later turned out to be a con man and an embezzler. Just like we believed Rachel Maddow and the rest of the MSM when they took us on a 30-month ride through BS-ville, promising impeachable offenses galore.

Just like we believed Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Strzok, and Lisa Page.

[HotHunt]

A book entitled "Anonymous" by an anonymous author written to attack the president anonymously and reported in the biggest anonymous fake news newspaper, owned by a far Left, Trump-hating democRAT, Jeff Bezos, the WashingtonComPost.

Now seriously, what could go wrong?

I wouldn't be surprised if the WashingtonComPost wrote this fake book themselves and published it to make their fake, made-up "news" stories sound real.

Enough with the anonymous fake news reporting about anonymous fake news. Enough already.

If a news source doesn't report the NAME of their source, corroborated by other NAMED sources, I don't believe any of it anymore.

For an account to be credible, it has to have a named source. Period.

Anybody can make up scurrilous information anonymously. Without a name, it is just fake news.

Anonymous, my ass.

[odawg]

It is hard to believe that some ambitious reporter with mobility could not find out who this person is. Not to mention some low-level intelligence officer.

Examine new Swiss bank accounts, etc.