[SeekAndFind]

The Washington Examiner's Jerry Dunleavy reported, Ciaramella appears in a footnote on Page 71 of Mueller's 448-page report. Mueller cited two emails from Ciaramella to then-Chief of Staff John Kelly and other administration officials describing the details of a meeting between Trump and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Trump met with them the day after he fired FBI Director James Comey.

"The meeting had been planned on May 2, 2017, during a telephone call between the President and Russian President Vladimir Putin, and the meeting date was confirmed on May 5, 2017, the same day the President dictated ideas for the Comey termination letter to [Trump aide] Stephen Miller," the Mueller report reads, citing Ciaramella's emails in a footnote.

The Mueller report went on to quote from a New York Times article published on May 19, 2017. That article cited an "American official" who leaked to reporters a "document summarizing the meeting."

[goldstategop]

Ciamarella was an Obama Deep State spy engaged in spying and leaking ad nauseum.

To call him a “whistleblower” is to do violence to the truth.

[Swordmaker]

To my knowledge on FreeRepublic, or elsewhere for that matter, no one has ever derived the background of the term “whistleblower.”

It is very simple. It comes from the whistle an impartial referee blows to call everyone’s attention to an infraction of the rules in a game of sport, such as a basketball game, a football game, or any other game where a referee, not partial to either team, is watching to be sure the game is played safely and fairly.

Such referee’s must be known to both sides as impartial, not as biased partial players for the other team, putting the weight of their calls on the side of one side or the other.

Eric Ciamarello is no “whistleblower,” but rather a biased player for the opposing team pretending to be a player for the other. That is an enemy agent, a spy.

[stylin19a]

and I'm thinking that's how the Repubs have to subpoena him...on the basis of the Mueller report not as the basis as the WB.

[philman_36]

That article cited an "American official" who leaked to reporters a "document summarizing the meeting."

Ah, any potential "retaliation" scheme is now blocked.

When Ciaramella is charged with leaking info the Dems can't say his being charged is "retaliation" because he is a whistle blower.