Posted on 11/07/2019 11:42:26 AM PST by Kaslin
RUSH: Man, oh, man, the surreal nature of all this is mind-boggling. We got this leaker, this whistleblowers attorney giving up the game! He even used the word coup back in 2017. He even said that CNN was gonna be utilized to run this coup to get rid of Donald Trump.
Now, it seems to me that since we know that, that all the rest of this should kind of just be canceled out. We know this whole thing is manufactured. Weve known it for a long time. Dont misunderstand. I dont mean to sound like Im learning something I dont know. Its just we now can actually, rather than have you rely on my credibility, which is not in question, weve got it in their own words.
Mark Zaid has been a Never Trumper, a Trump hating guy since 2016, the lawyer for the so-called whistleblower. Now, the way to look at this, imagine if we would have known this at the beginning. If at the very beginning of this we would have known what Mark Zaid said about this being a coup, that he was starting it, that it was going to involve CNN.
He has described exactly what is happening and what has happened in the House of Representatives. Imagine if this had leaked and we had become aware of it two years ago, where would we be today? We certainly wouldnt be where we are. And the fact that it has come out, Im looking at the headline here on drudge: Bolton to Defy White House, Testify. Why? None of this is real!
You know, I was talking the past couple days to somebody saying I dont know who it is. It doesnt matter the president needs to have a substantive response to the charge. There is no substantive charge. Thats the whole point. There is no substantive charge.
Another friend of mine, when Zaids tweets were revealed last night, the whistleblowers attorney, Mark Zaid, Z-a-i-d, when his tweets were revealed, a friend of mine sent me a note, You know, Rush, when I write about this stuff, I do everything I can to stay behind the evidence. I try not to get ahead of the evidence. And these guys continue to fool me. What he meant was he knows whats going on, but until he sees evidence of it, hes not gonna write about it.
I wrote back, What do you mean you dont have the evidence? Radical liberalism is the evidence! How do you think I know this stuff before it happens? He said, Well, yes, but radical liberalism would not be allowed to be used as the evidence in a court. Were not in a court! Were in a kangaroo court. Were in a so-called House of Representatives grand jury for crying out loud. And why do they call it grand jury? So Trump didnt get to have his lawyers in there.
To me liberalism, radical liberalism, what were dealing with is the evidence. But heres Bolton to Defy White House, Testify. So what? About what? We know that this is all a manufactured scam. Wait til we go through the actual transcripts of Bill Taylor, Mr. Unassailable, hes right up there with Robert J. Mueller the 19th. We cant criticize. We cant question Mr. Integrity, Mr. Honorable.
Do you know this guy admitted in his testimony that the only way he knew something was that he read it in the New York Times? He read it in the New York Times! Just like the FBI submitted stories from New York Times to the FISA judges and it said, Look, Judge, this is further evidence of what we found. Well, the problem was the only reason the New York Times had anything was FBI gave it to em.
So the FBI gives them evidence of Carter Page and all this stuff going on with the Russia collusion, then the New York Times prints what the FBI gave em. Then the FBI takes the New York Times story, puts it in the application packet, goes to the FISA court, says, Look, Judge. Why, even the New York Times knows what we know.
So Bill Taylor said that some of the things he knew he only know cause he read the New York Times. Well, we know the New York Times is making things up. This thing ought to be shut down is what ought to happen. It ought to be for the sake of preventing embarrassment on the part of all these people, this needs to be shut down. And Im gonna tell you, folks, if things break right over the next week or so, then Pencil Neck is gonna melt away.
As we talked about yesterday, the quid pro quo is disappearing. There never was a quid pro quo. Oh! Something else that were learning. Three of the star witnesses, Tim Morrison, Bill Taylor, and Ivana Yovanovitch or Michelle Yovanovitch, whatever the first name is, I dont know. You know what all three have admitted?
That Ukraine is in much better shape now than we were under Obama. That the aid Obama did not give them has been provided and Ukraine is in much better shape. They are much better prepared to defend themselves, their economy is much better after three years of Trump than after eight years of Obama. That hasnt been released of course. Schiff didnt release that stuff in his leaks of excerpted testimony to the New York Times.
So, yeah, the quid pro quo is disappearing, replaced now by obstruction, I pointed out yesterday. And when they go there, that means things are falling apart. Obstruction they went to after Muellers collusion failed. Now bribery? (laughing) The quid pro quo has been replaced by bribery, which is following the Mueller meltdown script as collusion is evaporating.
You know, folks, I made an observation yesterday, and that observation is when these people can control this by having it all done in private like for two and a half years, two years, whatever, the Mueller investigation. There wasnt one leak.
Oh, folks. Pardon my interrupting myself here, but I gotta tell you this. You know, ABC News had a whistleblower. Somebody working at ABC revealed that Amy Robach had the goods on Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign, and they spiked the story because it would have been damaging to Hillary. They refused to run it. Amy Robach is saying, Well, my bosses are fine people and Im not the whistleblower and I had nothing to do with it.
I was very surprised they spiked it but thats their business, they can do what they want to do. Anyway, the whistleblower at ABC who told everybody, went over and is now working at CBS, except hes not. Theyve already identified him and fired him! CBS has fired the ABC whistleblower, while at the same time theyre defending this Pajama Boy clown so-called whistleblower trying to nail Trump!
I just was emailed a bunch of pictures of the whistleblower the leaker and the pictures I guess theyre on Lets see. It just hit Twitter. Heres the guy with Elizabeth Warren. Here he is with Pelosi. Here he is with Chuck You Schumer. There he is with Hillary. The guy is the Pajama Boy! He looks just like it. I dont have time to copy, paste, and send you these pictures right now, but I will as the program unfolds, because there nobody else to do it, cause Im the tech wizard here.
If I ask somebody else to do it, itll take two hours. I can do it in a two-minute break if I apply myself. There whistleblower with Fauxcahontas, whistleblower with Pelosi, whistleblower with Chuck You Schumer, whistleblower with Hillary Rodham Clinton. This stinks to high hell low hell and theres none of it that is legitimate. But is it not hilarious that ABCs whistleblower gets canned and then gets hired at CBS? What ABC did, is they investigated. It took em all of a week to find out what the whistleblower was.
They found out he was at CBS, they called CBS, and they said, Youve got a guy that really just stuck it to us, and CBS said, No, we dont. Hes gone. Weve fired your whistleblower. So the Drive-Bys are sticking together. In one weeks time, ABC and CBS identified a whistleblower and then canned the guy. Meanwhile (impression), We dont know that we should identify the whistleblower identifying Donald Trump and Ukraine. We have to be very, very careful and certainly whistleblowers cant be fired.
Have you heard that? The primary whistleblower protection is they cant be fired. (Well, not unless they happen to work at CBS or ABC.) Anyway, its just (chuckles) I marvel at the people still taking this seriously as though it is a legitimate political or legal or what have you inquiry when it isnt. Its nothing more than a stunt. Its nothing more than oppo research, and Im gonna tell you this: If our guys in the media and in the Senate had been more united and tougher, this thing would have imploded much sooner than its going to.
But these tweets from Mark Zaid, theyre smoking guns. The guy, the lawyer lays it all out what weve been saying for three years. This means that the whistleblower (whose name is Ciaramella) and Lieutenant Colonel Vindman are no longer useful. They went from bombshells to now they are embarrassments, and they will not testify. They have been dropped. I doubt we will ever see or hear about them again except from hopeful media people. Now what we have, is we have State Department functionaries.
We got mid-level, upper-tier career State Department diplomats playing their careerist angles to try to save themselves with the establishment, to establish their own reputations within the establishment. Theyre all adjusting their stories. Another friend of mine thinks that were gonna see this blow up even before Barr and Durham issue whatever theyre gonna issue, their report or what have you. Now, Mark Zaid has issued a statement. You may not have heard his tweets. Ive made an assumption that everybody knows what Im talking about here, and maybe I should inform you.
This is Mark Zaid, the attorney for the whistleblower the leaker. He stated just days after President Donald Trump was inaugurated in January 2017 that the coup has started and that impeachment will follow.' Here are the tweets from the whistleblowers lawyer: #coup has started. First of many steps. #rebellion. #impeachment will follow ultimately. In another tweet, Zaid responded to President Trumps government account after Trump announced that he was appointing Dana Boente as acting attorney general.
Zaid wrote, #coup has started. As one falls, two more will take their place. #rebellion #impeachment. In a statement provided to Fox News, Trump campaign communication director Tim Murtaugh said, The whistleblowers lawyer gave away the game. It was always the Democrats plan to stage a coup and impeach President Trump and all they ever needed was the right scheme. They whiffed on Mueller so now theyve settled on the perfectly fine Ukraine phone call. This proves this was orchestrated from the beginning.'
Yeah, it does.
You have known its orchestrated from the beginning.
Youve known it from the beginning.
Now, Mark Zaid, in the midst of all this, has issued a statement, and heres what his statement says: Those tweets where he suggested a coup is underway and impeachment will follow and that theyre gonna get rid of Trump Those tweets were reflective and repeated the sentiments of millions of people. I was referring to a completely lawful process of what President Trump would likely face as a result of stepping over the line, and that particularly whatever would happen would come about as a result of lawyers.
The coup comment referred to those working inside the administration who were already, just a week into office, standing up to him to enforce recognized rules of law. Wait a minute. You say that this is no big deal; this is just the result of people in the White House who one week in recognized what an abomination Trump was? Mr. Zaid, Trump had not made the phone call to Ukraine yet. That didnt happen until 2019. That happened two years later, 2-1/2 years later. So these guys
Even in his statement, hes giving up the game that there were people in the Trump administration one week in Obama holdovers who were beginning to try to undermine the Trump presidency, and hes writing this as though he deserves credit for it. Why, Trump was overstepping the Hed been in office one week. Overstepping what? January 2017: #coup has started and #impeachment will follow. Now, Donald Trump Jr.s gonna be here at the top of the next hour. Hes got a new book out. Ive never interviewed Donald Trump Jr.
I know him. Ive had a couple conversations with him recently. I chatted with him on the golf course, but hes never been on the program before. So hell be here at the top of the hour. Well get some of your phone calls in. But man, folks, really, this has never been about anything. All of it has been made up and contrived. Now theres evidence that the contrivers and the people running this scam have admitted it. So if you ask me, everything that happens from today forward is nothing but the continuation of a soap opera script.
Its a play.
Its a Washington, D.C., production.
You know that Monmouth poll that we had yesterday with the devastating news for Democrats with the impeachment data? The medias not even using it. The media hasnt even talked about it. Theyve taken one thing from that poll, one result to prove that Trump followers are a cult. It was the Monmouth poll that 62% of Trump voters said theres nothing you can do to make me not support Trump. So theyve run with. See! See! Its a cult.
If Trump had a cult following, then Matt Bevin would have won the Kentucky race for governor. That same poll also showed that an even bigger number of Democrats are not gonna be change their minds and support Trump no matter what he does. The same poll makes the Democrat voter group seem an even bigger cult than Trumps. Anyway, folks, none of this is legitimate. You realize how hard it is to talk about? None of this is legitimate.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: So theres a little bit more to this Mark Zaid guy, who is the whistleblower lawyer who acknowledged that a coup to overturn the presidential election began one week after actually, it began during the transition. It began with Flynn. All of this began probably even before the election, if you want to know the truth. That was Strzok Smirk and Lisa Page with their Plan B insurance policy.
Mark Zaid tweeted on January 30th, 2017, A coup has started, first of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately. He also tweeted, Coup has started. As one falls, two more will take their place. As one falls, two more will take their place. What was he talking about there? Ill tell you what he was talking.
Mark Zaid was responding to the news that Trump had just fired Sally Yates. She was the acting attorney general. Remember, Sessions had recused himself. So Trump fired Sally Yates because Sally Yates instructed the Justice Department not to defend Trumps executive order, the travel ban. It was a temporary ban on the admission of refugees barred travel from terrorist hotbeds. Sally Yates told the Justice Department to ignore the president. So Trump canned her, fired her.
Mark Zaid was cheering on Sally Yates, cheering on an executive branch employee for refusing to carry out a lawful presidential order. However, this guys call for a coup did not stop there. In May of 2017, Mark Zaid tweeted, Johnson 1868, Nixon 1973, Clinton 1998, impeachment hearings. Next up, Trump. And in June of 2017 he tweeted, 45 years from now we might be recalling stories regarding the impeachment of Donald Trump. Ill be old, but it will be worth the wait. In July 2017, Mark Zaid tweeted, I predict CNN will play a key role in Donald Trump not finishing out his full term as president.
And now this guys (impression), Oh, no, no, theres nothing to see here. I was simply reflecting on what millions of patriots were reacting to when we saw what an abomination Trump was. I never heard of Mark Zaid before. This is the classic illustration of deep state, folks. I never heard of this guy. But everybody in Washington apparently knows who he is.
I talked to a friend of mine, Oh, yeah, this guys well known, Rush. Hes hated Trump since before Trump ran for president. This guys a Never Trumper, may be the head of the club. And he magically ends up as the lawyer for the so-called whistleblower.
July 2017: I predict CNN will play a key role in Donald Trump not finishing out Imagine if we had known this back then? Just imagine how the landscape would have changed. Now, again, folks, we did know. We just didnt have this backup. But we knew what they were doing. We knew there was no Trump-Russia collusion. There was no Russian meddling in the election. They didnt change the outcome of anything.
Theres another tweet later in July 2017, Mark Zaid: We will get rid of him, and this countrys strong enough to survive even him and his supporters. Note that in this tweet Mark Zaid included you in his hatred. He hates Trump and he hates you. Us. And this is exactly the point that we have been pounding here. That we actually may be the real targets of the hatred because if it werent for us, Trump would not have been elected. And make no mistake, they hate us.
These radical leftist deep state Washington establishment types literally hate us. The evidence of it is all over every mainstream media outlet: New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, ABC, CBS. Zaid tweeted that the coup would occur in many steps. And it wasnt just Mark Zaid. Another one of the whistleblowers lawyers, Andrew Bakaj, tweeted in August of 2017 that Trump ought to be removed under the 25th Amendment.
If you want an illustration of deep state, this is it, folks. People youve never heard of, people that were never elected, but they are career Washington elitists. Amazing, isnt it, how the whistleblower just happened to find this guy as a lawyer? How do you think that happened?
And to repeat Tim Murtaugh, the Trump campaign communications director, the whistleblowers lawyer gave away the game. It was always the Democrats plan to stage a coup and to impeach President Trump, and all they ever needed was the right scheme. They whiffed on Mueller; so now theyve settled on a phone call. This proves this was orchestrated from the beginning. It certainly does.
And, by the way, when Zaid was tweeting all of this rotgut back in 2017 the phone call between Trump and Ukraines president has not even happened, and it wouldnt happen for two years. Now, stop and think of that. Then he says its gonna happen in stages, that CNN is gonna be instrumental in it.
This is a big deal, folks. Theyre attempting to overturn a duly constituted and legal election. This is not just politics-as-usual. This is a direct assault on the Constitution. Its a direct assault on the American voter by a bunch of people who dont want to have to put up with what voters do or think. You elect the wrong person and theyre gonna try to take your choice away from you, and theyre gonna try to destroy the people you vote for as a means of destroying you and dispiriting you.
No. Get a surveillance warrant and tap all his communications, learning about the full extent of the conspiracy and the co-conspirators.
When you get everything, then do the 5am door smash search warrant.
It seems to me that a coup attempt is also Treason. A trial for Treason would be a seldom used crime, so the utes would like it for its uniqueness during their life.
USCode 2383 Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
HAIL HYDRA!
That's clever, Rush.
Add this POS to The List
When is the side of truth going to punch back.
[ USCode 2383 Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. ]
Thank you for posting
lawyers are very familiar with blacks law dictionary
REBELLION
Deliberate, organized resistance, by force and arms, to the laws or operations of the government, committed by a subject See Hubbard v. Harnden Exp. Co., 10 R. I. 247; State v. McDonald, 4 Port. (Ala.) 455; Crashley v. Press Pub. Co., 74 App. Div. 118, 77 N. Y. Supp. 711.
imo one dumb arrogant egotistical attorney..I wonder how he would fare in prison, is anyone lower than baby rapers to convicted criminals, maybe traitors?/
“...any office under the United States.”
Since it’s a federal law, I would assume it means a federal office of any sort.
But I could be incorrect. Good question.
just like the DOJ/FBI plan was before it....... in 2016, 2017 & 2018.
+10000
Yeah, and as soon as I get off this turnip truck, I'll send Zaid a thank you note for looking after my interests.
Rush mentioned on his show there were pics of the whistleblower with Nancy, Hillary, and others. Pictures of them side by side.
Do we have any of those before they are scrubbed??
Michael Savage just said that President Trump should enact what President Lincoln did when faced with a coup. President Lincoln had everyone who was part or partial of the coup against him arrested and tried. Accordingly, President Trump has the Constitutional authority to do exactly that and should do it immediately. It could likely be the only thing that will possibly avoid another US civil war. Or it may trigger it but either way, something has to be done to the coup scoundrels. MAGA, enforce the LAW!
[ Michael Savage just said that President Trump should enact what President Lincoln did when faced with a coup. President Lincoln had everyone who was part or partial of the coup against him arrested and tried. ]
Yes
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.