Replies

said that she would not remove potential jurors solely on the basis that they work for the federal government or because of their views of Trump. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

That’s a mistrial right there.

34 posted on 11/06/2019 1:57:02 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obam_the_quintessentia_1.html)

said that she would not remove potential jurors solely on the basis that they work for the federal government or because of their views of Trump. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s a mistrial right there.

I am not sure. In a federal court criminal case, can a judge deny a defense challenge in voir dire even if the defense insists on removing a juror?

When I first read this article, I thought the title meant that the judge was saying that the defense would have to use one of its voir dire strikes to remove such a juror.

37 posted on 11/06/2019 7:32:34 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe.)