Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Can't Block NY Grand Jury Subpoena Seeking Tax Records, 2nd Circuit Rules
Law.com ^ | November 4, 2019 | Jane Wester

Posted on 11/04/2019 11:31:50 AM PST by kiryandil

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: kiryandil

21 posted on 11/04/2019 11:47:47 AM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

He’s appealing it to the SC.


22 posted on 11/04/2019 11:49:12 AM PST by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Is it too late to get some judge somewhere to issue an order opening Obama’s college records?

Because inquiring minds still want to know why those records are sealed.


23 posted on 11/04/2019 11:49:24 AM PST by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

You find the Man, we’ll find the Crime.


24 posted on 11/04/2019 11:49:42 AM PST by Kickass Conservative (Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix
 thumbs-up thumbs-up
25 posted on 11/04/2019 11:49:53 AM PST by kiryandil (The Media & the DNC tells you who you're gonna vote for. We CHOSE Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

“Ruth Bader Corpseburg is in charge of the Second Circuit.”

I heard that this morning. Not sure how it works. If she decides to let the Second Circuit’s decision stand, does that end it, or will an appeal to full SCUTUS still be possible?

I’m guessing that it’s a big enough case that she won’t decide, and the whole court will take it up.


26 posted on 11/04/2019 11:50:35 AM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

“Actually, it was a three-judge panel, not the Second Circuit en banc.”

Well I hear the 2nd circuit may flip soon if McTurtle would get moving on a couple pending judge confirmations, so maybe there’s a chance to put the kibosh on it at the 2nd circuit.


27 posted on 11/04/2019 11:51:22 AM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
Thanks
28 posted on 11/04/2019 11:51:26 AM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Remind me again - why are we afraid of tax records?


29 posted on 11/04/2019 11:51:48 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

SCOTUS WILL RULE AGAINST THE APPEALS COURT. THE PRESIDENT HAS NOT BEEN CHARGED OR INDICTED, ERGO, TAX RECORDS SHOULD NOT BE RELEASED.


30 posted on 11/04/2019 11:51:51 AM PST by chopperk (ms)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Let’s see what SCOTUS says.

Absolutely! This whole Trump tax return issue is headed to the Supremes.

31 posted on 11/04/2019 11:52:24 AM PST by BAW (I support Donald Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

[[What is the crime?]]

Being a republican and being rich


32 posted on 11/04/2019 11:52:46 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: be-baw
See my post #13.

I think you might be right that it's a big enough case.

The Democrats are not considering the Unintended Consequences here.

If people start believing that the tax system is political, Katie bar the door.

33 posted on 11/04/2019 11:54:23 AM PST by kiryandil (The Media & the DNC tells you who you're gonna vote for. We CHOSE Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Remind me again - why are we afraid of tax records?
34 posted on 11/04/2019 11:54:33 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Like the ruling in general. Judicial process that’s’ not a burden on the President should proceed (see: Clinton).

A line has to be drawn though and I’d like the SC to draw a clear one.
Also it seems to me there are grounds to limit or disallow the subpoena. But I’m no lawyer.


35 posted on 11/04/2019 11:55:03 AM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Good one. :)


36 posted on 11/04/2019 11:56:09 AM PST by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: outpostinmass2

If those two women did get money, it wouldn’t be a crime.

It was unrelated to a criminal offense.

This prosecutor doesn’t know that?

He should be disbarred.


37 posted on 11/04/2019 11:57:50 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Pledge: "...and to the Democracy for which it stands..." I give up. Use the democRat meme...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Truthoverpower
who wouldn’t even begin to understand how to read Donald J Trump’s tax returns

Not only that but wouldn't his returns be filed by his vast cadre of tax attorneys?

38 posted on 11/04/2019 11:58:18 AM PST by Hot Tabasco (I'm in the cleaning business.......I launder money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

The tax records may show he has a loss carryforward from his losses in the casino BKs of long ago. Losses can be taken till used up. IOW, it is an attempt to undermine his business credibility because the common dolt does not know you sometimes lose on investments. Also, they will then allege he paid no tax. Maybe they should subpeona Barry’s drug sale records and see if he paid tax on them??


39 posted on 11/04/2019 12:05:23 PM PST by Mouton (The media is the enemy of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
Tax records are confidential for a reason.

Those who keep the records want cooperation from respondents. Cooperation goes down when respondents realize that their personal information is no longer confidential.

I just worked an operation for the 2020 Census.

Confidentiality is a HUGE issue in collecting information from respondents.

Imagine a tax respondent being able to say "You lie!" to a tax agent over confidentiality - with the proof right here in Trump's case.

40 posted on 11/04/2019 12:07:02 PM PST by kiryandil (The Media & the DNC tells you who you're gonna vote for. We CHOSE Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson