[seastay]

The democrats strategy, no crime is needed to impeach the president. The president’s authority can be challenged by a closed door committee session for any reason. They control the media, the most of all internet news so they will be defining what ever “rules” they wish, just google can the president be impeached without a crime, and this story is top result. They will accuse anybody who speaks the truth as misleading as in this CNN interview :

https://www.mediaite.com/news/cnns-camerota-triggers-matt-schlapp-by-telling-him-you-cant-be-misleading-about-trump-impeachment/

[reasonisfaith]

No kidding. It’s political.

But the deep state loves politics so much, they forget what political means.

Political means you can’t do it if the people don’t support it.

[Drango]

OK.

Then I’ll use the 2nd amendment to protect the Constitution.

[kiryandil]

Deplorable analysis:

It doesn't take a crime to "recall" a Democrat politician.

[DoughtyOne]

What do we have the U. S. Constitution for these days? Most of the Leftists can’t read it, and those who can aren’t able to grasp what those interconnected words mean.

High crimes and misdemeanors...

- - - - -

...no crime is needed...

Oh really?

- - - - -

Feelings, nothing more than feelings...

[adorno]

It doesn’t take a crime to impeach a president?

Then, just winning the presidency is cause enough to impeach.

Not being a member of the democrat party is enough to impeach.

Just talking back to democrats and defending himself is cause enough to impeach.

Passing tax cuts and reducing business killing regulations, is enough to impeach.

Being rich is cause enough to impeach.

Building ‘the wall’ is cause enough.

Being white is cause enough.

Why even run for president if a president can be impeached for any reason at all, including no reason at all.

[M Kehoe]

Dear Mark Sherman:

You, your boss and the democrats are full of shit.

The President (nice to capitalize again) will NOT be impeached or convicted in the Senate.

Have a nice day.

5.56mm

[Lisbon1940]

Misdemeanors are crimes.

[Socon-Econ]

For the 110th time: The American people need to know how Hunter got rich and what part his father played in it; and Trump violated neither law nor Constitution merely by asking for it.

[rockrr]

“For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction”

Karma is a bitch.

[hawkaw]

These Rats and their friends at the AP are making a mockery of a very serious process. No wonder EVERY SINGLE GOPer voted against the resolution this week.

[Political Junkie Too]

Then why has it only happened twice in 45 Presidents?

Because with the other 44 Presidents, they were dealing with people of honor, integrity, and respect for the history of their entrusted institutions?

-PJ

[Mat_Helm]

We have truly let a country full of idiot voters vote for idiot democrats who don’t know the law or rules and make things up as they go. That is why we are a Republic and not a democracy. This mob of morons supported by the idiots in the media being paid for by the global cabal of companies that own the media think they can fool most Americans. The democrats will soon be a minority for the next century.

[Repeal 16-17]

So the Democrats and the AP seem to be confusing impeachment with the parliamentary vote of no confidence. Unlike the vote of no confidence, impeachment requires "high crimes and misdemeanors." This means committing a crime or intentionally violating the Constitution.

If impeachment requires only that the House doesn't like the President, then the President would become a puppet of the Congress. The President was meant to be an independent of Congress. The Democrats impeachment effort isn't just an attack on President Trump, it's an attack on the presidency.

[LucyT]

.

PING

AP Analysis: It doesn’t take a crime to impeach a president

Article and comments.

[Sasparilla]

All that’s needed to Impeach the President boils down to what Rep. Al Green said. “ I we don’t Impeach him now,we will lose in 2020.”
That’s it.

[lurk]

The standard is high crimes and misdemeanors. So the House can send over to the Senate that he ate a Philly Cheese with a fork. Then there is a trial reffed by John Roberts and the Senate decides on his ouster.

While it’s got some failsafe in it, the impeachment can succeed, with the proper number of corrupt pols.

[Bob434]

[[no crime is needed to impeach the president.]]

They are actually, falsely calling what he did a crime as explained below-

nancy is now saying it ‘only takes ‘quid’- no ‘pro quo’ needed’- and a democrat strategist said tonight that noone else gets away with trying to do wrong even if they don’t succeed- so this gives you an idea of how this whole witch hunt is going to play out- the left are so invested in impeachment now that they must move the goalposts ever5y few days in order to keep their hateful dream alive

Their argument/impeachment case’ is gonna be- “Just asking someone to affect the 2020 elections is enough of a betrayal of the united states that impeachment is mandatory. It doesn’t matter if he succeeded or not- it’s still a crime for anyone else to commit, and the president isn’t above the law”

[Maris Crane]

THEN EVERY PRESIDENT FROM THIS TIME FORWARD CAN BE IMPEACHED BY THE OPPOSING POLITICAL PARTY.

COOL!

[Scott from the Left Coast]

And the political class and its media destroy yet another part of the Constitution.

[Alas Babylon!]

As it is now, we can probably expect an impeachment of every president when the opposition party is in control of the House.

Thanks, democrats, for ruining the United States.