Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/29/2019 6:40:26 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick; All

The Drive-bys are all over this today.


2 posted on 10/29/2019 6:42:02 AM PDT by mozarky2 (Ya never stand so tall as when ya stoop to stomp a statist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

Alexander Vindman, an Army lieutenant colonel who was awarded a Purple Heart in Iraq

Did he shoot himself in the foot like John Kerry from Vietnam??


3 posted on 10/29/2019 6:42:14 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

“The president began his day on Twitter swinging at the man, Alexander Vindman, an Army lieutenant colonel who was awarded a Purple Heart in Iraq, saying he had ‘never heard of’ him but insisting he is a ‘Never Trumper.’ “

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/29/us/politics/who-is-alexander-vindman.html

“The twins both married, and they have offices across from one another in the West Wing of the White House”


4 posted on 10/29/2019 6:44:42 AM PDT by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

/shrug

If I can’t see the testimony as it occurs, then I do not care about it at all.


5 posted on 10/29/2019 6:45:30 AM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

the White House NSC is a vipers nest and needs to be cleaned out. Who does this guy think he is?

I loath the Ukrainians, they have been out the get our President from before the election. Bolton is a moron to have left this guy on the council.


7 posted on 10/29/2019 6:47:56 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

What gets me is that they are parading a Lt Col around. The picture of Obama watching the Osama operation shows a 1 star acting as the computer geek for the office. An 0-5 would “literally” be the coffee gofer in an office like that.


8 posted on 10/29/2019 6:48:04 AM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

He’s a damned traitor. Purple heart or not. A disgrace


11 posted on 10/29/2019 6:52:09 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump

How many more Never Trumpers will be allowed to testify about a perfectly appropriate phone call when all anyone has to do is READ THE TRANSCRIPT! I knew people were listening in on the call (why would I say something inappropriate?), which was fine with me, but why so many?

8:47 AM · Oct 29, 2019

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump

Supposedly, according to the Corrupt Media, the Ukraine call “concerned” today’s Never Trumper witness. Was he on the same call that I was? Can’t be possible! Please ask him to read the Transcript of the call. Witch Hunt!

9:09 AM · Oct 29, 201


12 posted on 10/29/2019 6:52:54 AM PDT by McGruff (Does no one is above the law apply to Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

My question to Congress is how can our non- committee members vote for or against launching public Impeachment hearings this Thursday if they cannot see the evidence from Shifft’s charade?


13 posted on 10/29/2019 6:54:03 AM PDT by John 3_19-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

We already have the transcript. Why does this even matter?


17 posted on 10/29/2019 6:58:25 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick
on numerous occasions, Ukrainian officials sought him out for advice about how to deal with Mr. Giuliani

I'm sure all of his foreign contacts were within official channels, and if not, properly documented and vetted as part of any security clearance reviews.

18 posted on 10/29/2019 6:58:56 AM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

The dems are throwing out any remaining rule of law and going for mob rule. They state such things as “The majority of Americans want Trump impeached.” Not for crimes, but because they lost the 2016 election.

The democraps are trying to claim that unless the elected president’s party controls the congress and can stop an impeachment then the majority party can overturn a presidential election using impeachment.


20 posted on 10/29/2019 7:00:10 AM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

George Webb just tweeted about Vindman and the various aliases he has used:

https://twitter.com/GeorgWebb/status/1189134852592939013


26 posted on 10/29/2019 7:18:59 AM PDT by pugmama (Come fly with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

Vindman was discussing classified information without authorization, lock him up.


29 posted on 10/29/2019 7:32:41 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

Whatever happened to reading comprehension? Since this guy’s statement is in line what some people think is implied by the transcript and not the actual transcript itself I am not too impressed with this big reveal.

It does concern me that he among others makes no distinction between “I want you to investigate Joe Biden and his son” and “There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son,. that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great.”

Notice that nowhere does Trump directly request an investigation of the Bidens. What he does do his ask Zelensky about Biden stopping a Ukrainian prosecution started on Hunter. But notice the words “So whatever you can do with the Attorney General (RG) would be great.” These words put the choice of what should be done in Zelensky’s hands (and later in the conversation he does agree to look into the dropped investigation). There is no direct request. There is no implied or stated backscratching. There is no urgency. There are no threats of US withholding aid. In fact it is rather casual. I almost expect to read “I’ll get around to it.”.

I find that odd for a “demand” that if not met would mean a loss of millions in military aid the the Ukraine.


35 posted on 10/29/2019 9:43:05 AM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson