There isn’t a whistleblower and no one on the left wants to step up. Schifftbird can’t do it and he’s the only one dumb enough too do it. A Sham.
Nancy’s new rule is they have to Impeach Trump before you find out about the evidence
Spoiler Alert! If you don't want to know who the mole turns out to be, stop reading now.
-
-
-
-
-
-
It turns out that Kevin Costner's character is the mole. In other words, Adam Schiff is Yuri.
Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.
The “whistleblower” will not testify.
Everything will be kept secret.
The Rats will put together a list of allegations and declare them proven.
The Rats will vote to impeach.
The question is: how will the Pub senators react?
One American News; their news gal that covers DC coined a very fitting term for the Democrat’s whistleblower. She called him/her the whistle leaker. Definitely more accurate!
Now playing, the Hillary Clinton orchestra.
Since President Trump was elected,it was always someone behind the “Oz” curtain. Oz was always that Wicked Wench Clinton and the winged flying Obama monkeys.
Pay no attention to that “whistleblower” behind the curtain...
The President was conducting foreign policy, where the intelligence community has no oversight.
No whistle was blown, but a crime was committed by someone in the I.C.
Time for Graham to issue a subpoena for the whistlerblower (aka John Doe) to appear before the Sen. Judiciary Committee and answer a lot of questions. The subpoena can be served by the Sgt at Arms or Clerk of the Senate to the Clerk of the House and then forwarded to Schiff, who knows his identity.
Graham can possibly have the Capital Police serve the subpoena if the whistleblowers steps foot on Capital Hill.
Hell, they might even be able to serve a subpoena on Schiff etc for “hiding a material witness” to claims of a crime involving the President/White House.
Worth a try. Let the Left crap in their pants for a while.
The whistle blower is Shift-head’s female identity I bet.
The whistleblower HAD to disappear.
For two weeks it was non-stop;
" ... and the whistleblower, Ted ... whoever he or she may be ..... "
Do you see it?
I made a pain in the ass of myself pointing out that THEIR OWN FAKE NEWS EXPOSED THE GENDER FALLACY !
Of course the whistleblower faded, whoever he or she may have been.
gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings
THIS IS AMERICAN JUSTICE? When Jeanine pirro questioned house freedom caucus chairmen Andy Biggs about what are you going to do about this? He said well......we’re gonna file a protest, FILE A PROTEST? This fluff of a guy would get trampled by kindergarteners. The cancer against Trump is in the GOP as well
“...as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.”
It certainly isn’t. It was worthless from the start, only used as an excuse to lift the hoax off the ground. Exact same play as Steele dossier.
Now, Trump can be charged with obstruction because he resists the hoax and refuses to make-believe it is reality.
It’s 99.999% sure that it’s Eric Ciaramella, who was on the NCS under McMaster.
But he was just a cog in a much larger operation to take out Trump via impeachment this time.
The Ukraine hoax was and still is a full espionage job by Schiff’s intel committee plus never-Trumpers and Obama holdovers.
This video explains it all in detail.
WhistleBlower: Ciaramella? - IPOT Presents - 10.23.19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VKzO7CnaEk