Posted on 10/25/2019 12:32:34 PM PDT by Enlightened1
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) also voiced support for ammunition controls and background checks. She did not mention that the U.S. has had background checks since 1998.
On August 15, 2019, Breitbart News reported Warren’s promise of “executive action in every corner” for gun control, should she be elected.
On October 2, 2019, Breitbart News reported Warren’s push for a federal limit on the number of guns an American can purchase. She admitted that limited gun purchases will not solve gun violence by itself, suggesting it is “not a one and done” issue, but a very broad issue requiring numerous laws, regulations, changes.
On October 15, 2019, Breitbart News reported Warren’s plan to use excise taxes to reduce firearm and ammunition sales. The plan to use excise taxes was published by Medium where readers saw Warren’s belief that the current ten percent excise tax on firearms is too low. She made clear she wants to raise that tax to 30 percent while increasing the tax on ammunition to 50 percent.
This would immediately raise the price of a $500 gun to $650 and would increase the price of a $20 box of ammo to $30. Such taxation could render the Second Amendment cost-prohibitive for the poor.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I believe most Americans don't understand that the second amendment is to allow you guns to kill people who would take away your constitutional guarantees of freedom.
Hunting and self defense are secondary fringe benefits.-Tom
There goes my Christmas layaway on the RPG launcher I ordered.
Starting with her mouth and bad breath.
If only Pochahontas was as concerned about innocent children being murdered in the womb.
Weapons of war? The only politician who has a clue on the topic are the ones who wore a uniform. These asshole politicians don’t know the difference between a cartridge and a bullet, a magazine and a clip. I defy any politician to tell us the caliber of the Armalite 15 rifle.
It’ll take a Constitutional Amendment,Liawatha. Check Caetano v Massachusetts (SCOTUS) for confirmation.
She is so nasty. I hope that she wins the Democrat nomination. She is as unelectable as the previous nasty woman who won the last Democrat nomination.
And she includes muskets in that, right?
BiB!
She has what I call, PERMASCOWL.
“take weapons of war off our street.”
Wow, some of you guys drive around Sherman tanks? Impressed!
Then keep the known criminals in jail instead of releasing them like Democrats want to do.
Yup.....frighteningly reminiscent of her royal Hillariness. They could almost be twins.
Hey, Liz, I have a simple solution for you! All Democrats want gun control, right? Fine - pass a law against Democrats possessing guns.If the Democrats obey that law, the gun crime problem basically disappears, because the crime problem is not a Republican problem remotely as much as it is a Democrat one.
Make Soap
and Lampshades!
Classic whack-job...
If I tried to donate my AR15 to the Army, they Army would reject it because it is FUNCTIONALLY INFERIOR to real weapons of war.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.