Posted on 10/23/2019 9:14:06 PM PDT by Helicondelta
As the country watches in horror a Texas father’s legal battle to prevent his ex-wife from “transitioning” their seven-year-old son into a girl, a growing chorus of Americans is demanding state and federal leaders intervene to save James Younger.
On Monday, a Dallas jury ruled 11-1 against father Jeffrey Younger in his fight against his ex-wife, Dr. Anna Georgulas, who wants to subject young James to puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones as well as legally force his father to treat him as a girl. Mr. Younger contends that all of this is being pursued against his son’s will.
“Conservatives would be wise to pressure Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Governor Dan Patrick to convene a special session of the legislature and criminalize all non-medical removals of male or female genitalia,” Conservative Review senior editor Daniel Horowitz said.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
The mother should be locked up. Immediately.
Californians voted against gay marriage... And it was over turned by the courts...
I think....
[trying to create low IQ narratives like this.]
It helps them convince total fools that voting Democrat is a good thing.
“ must submit to two years in a psychiatric hospital to be evaluated.”
There are no more psychiatric hospitals. And psychiatrists are the last people in the world who should be evaluating this phenomenon - they created it.
Does anyone know what the question in front of the jury was?
The crazy mother is a doctor. Shows you how wacko the Medical field has gone. Someone posted her name and contact info yesterday. Hope she gets flooded with angry contacts. These people need to be outed for their insanity.
The abuse probably started the day the kid was born (or more correctly, the day the abortion option expired). Mommie dearest was probably angry that she wasn’t able to deliver a little girl.
We are returning to the era of castration to produce eunuchs and men who could sing as boys. Castration was a prerequisite for entering imperial service in the Ming Dynasty, where at one time, 70,000 eunuchs were employed to serve the emperor in the mid-17th Century.
The Catholic Church castrated boys before puberty to create an unusual high-pitched singing voice broadly comparable to that of a soprano, mezzo-soprano, or contralto, when women were banned from singing in choirs. This practice began in the 1550s and continued to 1903 when Pope Pius X pronounced an official end to the practice.
The sterilization of boys and men is a part of the extensive catalogue of cruelty that humans have inflicted on others. It included not only the severance of the testicles, but also the penis as well. It was a severely painful procedure of extraordinary cruelty and horror. The consequence to the victim was indescribable not only because it denied the ability to reproduce but also the psychological damage impossible to imagine. It was treating human beings as livestock and animals to be used as pets.
“Both sides have a say..”
_____________________________
dp0622,
When the jury is rigged both sides do not honestly have their say.
As a mother, aunt, and grandmother, I am appalled at what was decided by the jury and judge.
This is all about the Feminist Movement in America.
Actually, this is the only logical outcome of the Feminist movement.
While the original rank and file of the Sufferage Movement may have been about one thing, the leadership (behind the scenes) understood what they fully wanted: Destruction of the Male.
The perverted followed those plans to a T.
The unwilling were dragged along.
I’ve seen ‘the process’ at work and it isn’t what it was supposed to be, not by a nightmare of a mile.
Kinda like what recently happened in Brazil, where two lesbians castrated, then later killed, a boy in their custody.
I was hoping someone to make your comment. I believe the lawsuits that will occur as a result of these gender reassignments will be enormous. Those who participated in this unnatural desecration of a human being will pay big for damages they caused. I compare it to sending someone out on a bungee jump with a rotten bungee. There will be no limits to the reparations. I wish I had a law degree. The money I could make!
I think this is the leading cause. Other parents are finding out the sex of the baby in the womb using ultrasound. If it's the sex they did not want, off to the abortion. The value of life and the sanctity of the individual is gone with these people. The sex change industry and these immoral parents will reap a consequence when their chickens come home to roost.
When I was seven, I thought that girls had cooties and were yucky. One time, my enemy, the girl I had to sit next to in class forgot to wear panties, and I got a good look at her pooter, but was not in the least titillated, though interested so long as I could look without getting caught. I just had one more reason to despise her, in my view. Later, I discovered how utterly wonderful girls are, but I never ever wanted to become one. Kid, you’ll get cooties and be yucky, and boys will want to see your fake pooter.
NOW was founded by an unstable woman named Kate Millett
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kate_Millett
...Millett was one of the first writers to describe the modern concept of patriarchy as the society-wide subjugation of women.[21] Biographer Gayle Graham Yates said that “Millett articulated a theory of patriarchy and conceptualized the gender and sexual oppression of women in terms that demanded a sex role revolution with radical changes of personal and family lifestyles”. Betty Friedan’s focus, by comparison, was to improve leadership opportunities socially and politically and economic independence for women...
...While Millett was speaking about sexual liberation at Columbia University, a woman in the audience asked her, “Why don’t you say you’re a lesbian, here, openly. You’ve said you were a lesbian in the past.” Millett hesitantly responded, “Yes, I am a lesbian”.[30] A couple of weeks later, Time’s December 8, 1970 article “Women’s Lib: A Second Look” reported that Millett admitted she was bisexual, which it said would likely discredit her as a spokesperson for the feminist movement because it “reinforce[d] the views of those skeptics who routinely dismiss all liberationists as lesbians.”
...In her 1971 book The Prostitution Papers, Millett interprets prostitution as residing at the core of the female’s condition, exposing women’s subjection more clearly than is done with marriage contracts. According to her, degradation and power, not sex, are being bought and sold in prostitution. She argues for the decriminalization of prostitution in a process directed by the sex workers themselves...
...In an interview with Mark Blasius, Millett was sympathetic to the concept of intergenerational sex, describing age of consent laws as “very oppressive” to gay male youth in particular but repeatedly reminding the interviewer that the question cannot rest on the sexual access of older men or women to children but a rethinking of children’s rights broadly understood.[39] Millett added that “one of children’s essential rights is to express themselves sexually, probably primarily with each other but with adults as well” and that “the sexual freedom of children is an important part of a sexual revolution ... if you don’t change the social condition of children you still have an inescapable inequality”.[39] In this interview, Millett criticized those who wished to abolish age of consent laws, saying the issue was not focused on children’s rights but “being approached as the right of men to have sex with kids below the age of consent” and added that “no mention is made of relationships between women and girls”.[39]
...Mental illness affected Millett’s personal and professional life from 1973,[23][37] when she lived with her husband in California and was an activist and teacher at the University of California, Berkeley. Yoshimura and Sally, Kate’s eldest sister, became concerned about Kate’s extreme emotions.[18] Her family claimed that she went for as many as five consecutive nights without sleep and could talk nonsensically for hours. During a screening of one of her films at University of California, Berkeley, Millett “began talking incoherently”. According to her sister, Mallory Millett-Danaher, “There were pained looks of confusion in the audience, then people whispered and slowly got up to leave.”[37] Sally, who was a law student in Nebraska, signed papers to have her younger sister committed. Millett was forcefully taken and held in psychiatric facilities for ten days. She signed herself out using a release form intended for voluntary admissions. During a visit to St. Paul, Minnesota, a couple of weeks later, her mother asked Kate to visit a psychiatrist and, based upon the psychiatrist’s suggestion, signed commitment papers for Kate. She was released within three days,[18] having won a sanity trial,[50] due to the efforts of her friends and a pro bono attorney.[18]
Following the two involuntary confinements, Millett became depressed, particularly so about having been confined without due process. While in the mental hospitals, she was given “mind-altering” drugs or restrained, depending upon whether she complied or not. She was stigmatized for having been committed and diagnosed with manic depression (now commonly called bipolar disorder). The diagnosis affected how she was perceived by others and her ability to attain employment.[18][23][37] In California doctors had recommended that she take lithium to manage wide manic and depression swings. Her depression became more severe when her housing in the Bowery was condemned and Yoshimura threatened divorce. To manage the depression, Millett again began taking lithium.[18][51]
In 1980, with support of two friends and photojournalist Sophie Keir, Millett stopped taking lithium to improve her mental clarity, relieve diarrhea and hand tremors, and better uphold her philosophies about mental health and treatment. She began to feel alienated and was “snappish” as Keir watched for behavioral changes.[18] Her behavior was that of psychiatric drug withdrawal, including “mile-a-minute” speech, which turned her peaceful art colony to “a quarrelsome dystopia.”[46] Mallory Millett, having talked to Keir, tried to get her committed but was unsuccessful due to New York’s laws concerning involuntary commitments.[18]
Millett visited Ireland in the fall of 1980 as an activist. Upon her intended return to the United States, there was a delay at the airport and she extended her stay in Ireland. She was involuntarily committed in Ireland after airport security “determined from someone in New York” that she had a “mental illness” and had stopped taking lithium.[18] While confined, she was heavily drugged. To combat the aggressive pharmaceutical program of “the worst bin of all”, she counteracted the effects of Thorazine and lithium by eating a lot of oranges or hid the pills in her mouth for later disposal. She said of the times when she was committed, “To remain sane in a bin is to defy its definition,” she said.
Puberty blockers? Doesn’t he want to grow up and unfairly win in girls’ athletics? He should wait ‘til he gets the upper body strength and aggressive instincts. Then he can get the wicki-otomy, if he still wants it.
Remember this?
I have always said, if faced with a criminal trial, I'll demand a judge if innocent and a jury trial if guilty.
Actually, they did.
You may recall "the Defense Of Marriage Act" that was passed by Republicans and signed by, of all people, Bill Clinton.
During the dark years of Obama (specifically in 2012) that law was challenged in the Supreme Court - and defeated - when Attorney General of the United States Eric Holder (may he be damned and his name erased from the minds of men, forever) declined to defend the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.