Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo

The 6.5 Grendel has better long range ballistics.


41 posted on 10/23/2019 4:18:17 PM PDT by Bogey78O (So far so good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bogey78O

But it shoots light to medium weight for caliber bullets with rather middle of the road BC at geriatric velocities ( bettering the 556 by BC only, and then with longer than desired bbl lengths ( what does a 120 grn Grendel do from a 14.5 inch carbine?), eats up mag space badly, is oversize case body wise resulting in bare minimum structure in the breech of an AR15 platform.

Otherwise, the Grendel is a decent AR15 round, loaded to moderate pressures shooting light for caliber bullets.... the best part is the fact that it is a .264 diameter bullet.


49 posted on 10/23/2019 4:42:54 PM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Bogey78O

I built a 6.5 Grendel. Nice rifle. I like it a lot but I don’t go to battle. My rifle is very serviceable, but I don’t serve in combat. The original design of the Gerand was a .277 round. Army said all ammo out there is .30 caliber. They adapted it I have a M1 Gerand a great rifle but I am so prejudice for it. Get the troops the best, what ever it turns out to be. IMO


55 posted on 10/23/2019 5:30:48 PM PDT by Equine1952 (Get yourself a ticket on a common mans train of thought))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson