No, it just takes that long for them to investigate in a PC environment. It’s actually not bad timing for Trump.
Difficult to see how to convict. After all, they did defame the profit, and that is a crime worthy of death...and that is exactly what happened.
[and, by the way, since France is now ‘multicultural’, they have to accept that Islamic Law, Sharia, applies in these situations]
It’s France. It could mean anything form actually trying the murderers to trying the staff for some sort of hate crime to trying the dead people for impeding the murderers’ bullets.
President Obama blamed the victims of the attack for insulting Islam and refused to stand with European leaders to march and denounce the attacks.
So, what is going on!? Charlie Hebdo was from all I’ve read the victim of jihad. IF Charlie Hebdo was the victim, then how does one put the “people associated WITH Charlie Hebdo” on trial? Makes no sense unless the French are putting the satirical product of Charlie Hebdo magazine on trial, of which I would not put past them to do.
0bama blamed Republicans and also got in some good shots about immigration that we’re ‘afraid’ of children and orphans, LOL! What a POS!
https://time.com/4117688/barack-obama-paris-attacks-republican/
“They’ve been playing on fear to score political points or to advance their campaigns and it’s irresponsible,” he continued, in reference to the candidates seeking the Republican nomination. “It needs to stop because the world is watching. I was proud attacks in Boston take place and we did not resort to fear and panic. Boston Strong.”
View, but keep your barf bucket at the ready!
Four years to bring these people to trial!!!!
Justice does not move fast enough.
Courts and the body of jurists (in every western country) are saddled with societies that want to litigate everything, sue over everything, write opaque laws subject to interpretation which causes people to act in ways they do not yet know the authorities will classify as illegal, and add their cases to the millions of cases the class of jurists has to hear.
Meanwhile, a murderer, rapist or terrorists knows that the justice that needs to be placed against them will not be swift and they will have many years of life before they will ever face any negative fate for their acts - and then too often they will still get to keep their life.
Maybe what we need to do is make it more difficult to mount civil suits, by moving tons of judges from civil courts to expanded criminal courts, and get criminals the swift justice they deserve.
Trials just now? It has been four years! They should have had a date with Madame Guillotine within six months!
Hang them all on the Champs Elysée.
Yes, bad headline.