Posted on 10/22/2019 3:10:30 PM PDT by rintintin
Is Tulsi a natural born citizen?
She was born in Leloaloa, American Somoa in 1981
Tulsi claims to have been brought up in a multireligious and multicultural ambiance since her father is a lector at a Catholic church and her mother, a European and is a practicing Hindu. Tulsi chose to follow Gaudiya Vaishnavism when she was a child.
Her name, Tulsi is a sacred holy plant to Hindus.
She was homeschooled and did not attend school except for 2 years; in a girls-only missionary academy in the Philippines.
She considers ‘Bhagavad Gita’ her spiritual guide and administered oath from it when she was appointed to the House of Representatives.
Bernie Sanders in a dress. Curious how enamored the Right has become of this Democrat Fascist political lunatic simply because she told off a Clinton.
Oh please. I could care less what she looks like. It’s her extremist positions that bother me and the fact that Globalists on the right keep giving her face-time on MSM.
Her father is Samoan, her mother is European, whatever that means. She was born in Samoa and it’s questionable that she is a natural born citizen.
Her politics are left...a gun grabber, global warming, green new deal, prefers relaxing laws on Chinese and Indian tourism. She supports gay rights, abortion, Obamacare, cuts to defense spending, yet she supported $500M and 3,000 troops to Africa to fight Ebola. She supports federal stimulus spending.
And on and on.
She is not a hero.
I believe her to be a trojan horse whose purpose is the separate Independents from the PDJT election camp.
Anybody actually read the article? She’s hate for being a veteran who speaks out against our endless wars.
The article points out that Tulsi was the ONLY Democrat in Congress to oppose Obama’s war to overthrow the Syrian government.
She sponsored a bill - the “Stop Funding Terrorists Act” - to block money from going to Islamic terrorists in Syria. These were the terrorists we were funding (thanks to Obama, Hillary and McCain) in our effort to take down Assad and throw Syria into chaos. Benghazi was a check point in the flow of funds and arms to our Syrian terrorist “allies.”
No other Democrats joined Tulsi’s bill, and precious few Republicans. Like McCain and Lindsey, most Republicans supported the regime change war in Syria, and our other Middle East wars as well. They STILL want us there - witness the resolution that Mitch introduced in the Senate, today, opposing Trump’s withdrawal from Syria.
Because Tulsi speaks out publicly against our Establishment’s regime change wars - starting with the war that her own party’s president (Obama) launched - the Establishments of both parties, the media, and the Deep State hate her.
It’s all about the wars.
I’m aware of her “good points,” but feel her bad points far outweigh her positives.
Not a reason to vote for her in any way at all. I believe her BFF bernie boy sanders has the same position.
Check out this new Tulsi video:
“Hillary, Acknowledge the Damage You’ve Caused”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGBbaYeEUik
On the other hand, her smacking the diseased old skank hillary around is excellent. A new ad:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3788293/posts
Ha. you beat me to it.
And after she’s thoroughly trounced, either in the primaries or the general election, should she be nominated, there would be a place for her in the Trump DOD that will help assure that the US is actually kept out of these wars in future. Communist or not, that kind of sincerity could be a useful thing to Trump, who is likewise committed to avoiding these wars, and is likewise hated by the establishments of both parties. They are natural allies.
Gabbard is red-pilling the Democrats...you dummy.
Gabbard is blue pilling the Republicans, you dummy.
Trump is doing just fine without putting a Communist whore into his administration.
A communist whore who’s seen the elephant and didn’t like it much might be exactly what’s needed to withstand the storm of opposition these withdrawals will definitely entail. She’s seen war up close. Of course they’re going to oppose her; she’s a communist whore. And being a veteran gives her the cred to withstand the opposition. Everyone has their uses.
For three terms, FDR’s VP was Henry Wallace, a dyed-in-the-wool socialist and a successful businessman. Then in 1944, he was up against Dewey, so he switched to Harry Truman, a New Dealer known to make racist statements, but an anti-Communist. The results were the election of 1948, won against all odds against Henry Wallace, Strom Thurmond and the aforesaid Dewey. Moral of the story: Use people of different ideological stripes, and then discard them.
BTW, until 1948, Henry Wallace was Truman’s Secretary of Agriculture.
The Trump campaign is reporting roughly 20% of those attending his rallies recently are registered Democrats.
Can you cite even a single example of similar crossover to the Democrats by Republicans?
Of course you can't...you're too busy larping.
All you had to do was look down the page. Everyone singing her praises when a simple check of her stances on the issues shows that she is a fraud. She is a rabid progressive. She isn’t even a natural born citizen.
Abortion, borders, guns, green new deal, climate change, and on and on. Tell me again how she is red pilling with a slate like that.
If she continues making noise, it is fake, and is being done with the approval of the bosses.
My money is on they shut her up.
IOW...absent any quantifiable evidence and despite contrary evidence from the Trump campaign itself about shifting political demographics, you’ve decided to impose your own uniformed opinion about the effect Tulsi Gabbard is having on Republican voters and the 2020 race...got it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.