Anybody actually read the article? She’s hate for being a veteran who speaks out against our endless wars.
The article points out that Tulsi was the ONLY Democrat in Congress to oppose Obama’s war to overthrow the Syrian government.
She sponsored a bill - the “Stop Funding Terrorists Act” - to block money from going to Islamic terrorists in Syria. These were the terrorists we were funding (thanks to Obama, Hillary and McCain) in our effort to take down Assad and throw Syria into chaos. Benghazi was a check point in the flow of funds and arms to our Syrian terrorist “allies.”
No other Democrats joined Tulsi’s bill, and precious few Republicans. Like McCain and Lindsey, most Republicans supported the regime change war in Syria, and our other Middle East wars as well. They STILL want us there - witness the resolution that Mitch introduced in the Senate, today, opposing Trump’s withdrawal from Syria.
Because Tulsi speaks out publicly against our Establishment’s regime change wars - starting with the war that her own party’s president (Obama) launched - the Establishments of both parties, the media, and the Deep State hate her.
It’s all about the wars.
I’m aware of her “good points,” but feel her bad points far outweigh her positives.
Not a reason to vote for her in any way at all. I believe her BFF bernie boy sanders has the same position.
On the other hand, her smacking the diseased old skank hillary around is excellent. A new ad:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3788293/posts
And after she’s thoroughly trounced, either in the primaries or the general election, should she be nominated, there would be a place for her in the Trump DOD that will help assure that the US is actually kept out of these wars in future. Communist or not, that kind of sincerity could be a useful thing to Trump, who is likewise committed to avoiding these wars, and is likewise hated by the establishments of both parties. They are natural allies.