New York Times Narrative Engineers Start Positioning DOJ/FBI “Small Group” Coup-Plotters as Victims

theconservativetreehouse.com ^ | 10/19/19 | sundance

[mo]

AG Barr’s investigation will grow SO big it will it will take AT LEAST another 5 years....and employ THOUSANDS of DC lawyers....and finally peter out after the 2024 inaugural.

You heard it here first

[Mouton]

The defense is also representative of what these reports will say: rogue group. Of course we all know that this did not happen in a a vacuum. In fact Brennan tipped his hand last month saying: I must have been given bad intel. He did not say it came via ohaha. The inference some mail clerk came up with the rationale. So given he had bad info about trump what was he to do let him win. So he and his cohort comey thought it best to let the witch skate on her law violations.

[Sgt_Schultze]

This is self preservation. The NYT knows, without leaks from the coup plotters and embedded enemies in government, there is simply NO content for their so-called journalists to transcribe.

[milagro]

According to the Conservative Tree House article I read on FR yesterday, the witch hunt against Trump was/is led by 3 “small group” entities: 1) DOJ/FBI, 2) CIA/DNI and 3) State Department. Each group had/has “specific and unique media outlets” they use to spread their propaganda, and uses the “same reporters & pundits for distribution” of that propaganda.
#1 Group uses NYT & NBC
#2 GROUP uses Wash Post & ABC
#3 GROUP uses CNN & CBS
So, yesterday, out come articles questioning the legitimacy of the Barr/Durham investigations, and—guess what—they are from the NYT and NBC!
Surprise, surprise!

[blackdog]

And the small group also claims to be misled by pro wrestling.

[AnthonySoprano]

.

SALLY YATES.

Up to her neck in this thing, and she lied to Congress.

I don’t know if small group is the correct moniker.

‘

[mewzilla]

treason and sedition has a lot of moving parts

Both domestic and foreign...

[hardspunned]

The “impeachment” is a nothing more than a cover to distract from the 2016 Manafort frame and the CrowdStrike/Ukraine/DNC collusion. If Durham has been granted a free hand to pursue criminality where he finds it, can he begin investigating the corrupt origins of the “impeachment”?

[Widget Jr]

They are criminal conspirators, not victims.

[blackdog]

The small group thing is funny. By definition it means the media wants to limit this thing. They put a conclusion forward before they investigate. Nothing new there though.

[Flick Lives]

I don’t know if small group is the correct moniker.

—

I prefer the term “small batch”. Sounds more artisanal.

[a little elbow grease]

"If Durham has been granted a free hand to pursue criminality where he finds it, can he begin investigating the corrupt origins of the “impeachment”?"

________________

Yes.

If there would be justice, that investigation/exposition should be NEXT.

(After all, some of the players are part of both of them.)

[a little elbow grease]

The NYT knows, without leaks from the coup plotters and embedded enemies in government, there is simply NO content for their so-called journalists to transcribe.

_______________

true

[FtrPilot]

According to the Conservative Tree House article I read on FR yesterday,

Here's a link to that article...certainly worth reading.

Conservative Tree House article

Sundance has conducted a lot of analysis WRT FISA abuse, the upcoming IG report, and the Durham investigation... always worth reading.

In the OP, Sundance concludes that Durham's team has a leaker that leaks to the NYT.

If that is true, then, IMHO, the Durham investigation will be a white wash.

However, I don't think that any of the links came from within Durham 's team. I believe the leaks came from individuals who were interviewed by Durham.

I also believe that these leaks are trying to de-legitimize Durham's investigation. Hopefully, this will fail.

[a little elbow grease]

"It would take Horowitz a year to come up with a report on what he had for breakfast."

_________________

.... it sure seems that way.

Maybe, Bonemaker, things are to change.

I see substantial changes in nature this fall here in western PA. I'm 73 and have been observing nature closely nearly all of those years. Sometimes patterns go along repeating themselves for decades, seemingly endlessly. Then one season there is a substantial change.

Maybe Wm. Barr will put down the bagpipes long enough to live by his recent and very welcome revelations concerning our country.

"This is not decay. This is organized destruction. Secularists and their allies have marshaled all the forces of mass communication, popular culture, the entertainment industry, and academia in an unremitting assault on religion & traditional values."

*****

Change is in the wind here ...... in the form of the benign power of DJT and fellow patriots/friends of justice.

(jmo)

[a little elbow grease]

I don’t know if small group is the correct moniker.

__________

Yes, sir.

[jospehm20]

NYT should be charged along with their fellow coup plotters.

[Engedi]

Let’s not forget, run out statue of limitations too.

[Bonemaker]

Interesting observations my friend. Speaking of observations, maybe it's an old indian omen or something but my 1 acre is a veritable wildlife preserve and I found a rare snake yesterday, a Dekays snake. Cold at night so unusual in October. Thought it was a night crawler at first. About the diameter of a pencil and 7" long. Hope it's a good sign.

It was like this:

[HotHunt]

And yesterday brings an article from NBC where they wonder whether Barr's expanded review of the origins of the Russian collusion investigation has any legal or factual basis.

They are preemptively questioning whether Barr's investigation and expanded review of the Russian collusion lie, has any legitimate basis.

Trying to insert their own narrative into the process and delegitimize the official investigation.

NBC Questions Legal and Factual Basis of Barr's Origins of Russian collusion Investigation