To: yesthatjallen
I’m so glad that I bought all those whitewash futures...
2 posted on
10/18/2019 4:06:42 PM PDT by
SuperLuminal
(Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
To: yesthatjallen
The Clinton Crime Machine will spend whatever it takes to bribe and/or blackmail their way out of punishment. Hillary Clinton spent well over a billion losing her elections and I don’t think she’ll run out of cash soon.
3 posted on
10/18/2019 4:10:04 PM PDT by
\/\/ayne
(I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
To: yesthatjallen
it did not find "systemic misuse" of classified information.
Did they find any "systemic hiding of Hillary's 'pay to play' and other malfeasance" from FOIA requests?
4 posted on
10/18/2019 4:10:15 PM PDT by
JayNorth
(The Democrats have proven themselves to be pure evil.)
To: yesthatjallen
People used to get locked up for such violations, because these kinds of things can give our enemies access to important defense and security information, which can damage the US.
5 posted on
10/18/2019 4:11:31 PM PDT by
Innovative
(https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/maria-bartiromo-walks-back-scoop-on-release-date-for-fisa-re)
To: yesthatjallen
“..but found no “persuasive evidence” of classified information being systematically, deliberately mishandled...”
Of course not.
9 posted on
10/18/2019 4:17:23 PM PDT by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: yesthatjallen
“noted in their files”
People who get fired for less, or even go to jail, have a note in their files too.
11 posted on
10/18/2019 4:23:21 PM PDT by
fruser1
To: yesthatjallen
So this means 497 times ONLY Hillary was responsible.
12 posted on
10/18/2019 4:29:27 PM PDT by
JohnBovenmyer
(waiting for the tweets to hatch)
To: yesthatjallen
So this means 497 times ONLY Hillary was responsible.
13 posted on
10/18/2019 4:29:27 PM PDT by
JohnBovenmyer
(waiting for the tweets to hatch)
To: yesthatjallen
Yawn, nothing will happen to them
14 posted on
10/18/2019 4:36:10 PM PDT by
rainee
(Her)
To: yesthatjallen
What about the other 300000+ that are being ignored?
15 posted on
10/18/2019 4:38:19 PM PDT by
hans56
(I'm not tired of winning yet)
To: yesthatjallen
So a totem pole of 38 people with each one’s head up the others ass and no shit found in the ears or cheeks
Got it
17 posted on
10/18/2019 4:43:04 PM PDT by
advertising guy
(When they told Jerry Nadler he had a flesh eating disease , they gave him 87 years to live)
To: yesthatjallen
Report summary:
Something happened.
20 posted on
10/18/2019 6:13:30 PM PDT by
cgbg
(Vote Trump or you will _be_ Trump)
To: yesthatjallen
The law, as written in the U.S. Code, does not care if the misuse was systemic or deliberate. It only cares, “Was there misuse or wasn’t there?” There was.
22 posted on
10/18/2019 6:44:09 PM PDT by
pjd
To: yesthatjallen
... found no "persuasive evidence" of classified information being systematically, deliberately mishandled.The word 'deliberately' in that sentence is a deliberate whitewash. It is meant to obfuscate the fact that intent is not required to be in violation of the law.
Ask Petty Officer First Class Kristian Saucier who spent a year in prison, six months of electronic monitoring and a total of three years of supervised release for taking a photo in the submarine he was stationed on.
24 posted on
10/18/2019 6:54:36 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: yesthatjallen
“found no “persuasive evidence” of classified information being systematically, deliberately mishandled.”
The mere existence and use of the non-Government server was evidence of systematic and deliberate mishandling! What total BULL SPIT!
25 posted on
10/18/2019 7:50:09 PM PDT by
Fireone
(Build the gallows first, then the wall!)
To: yesthatjallen
“...found no “persuasive evidence” of classified information being systematically, deliberately mishandled.”
According to the law, that doesn’t make any difference.
26 posted on
10/19/2019 6:12:32 AM PDT by
ops33
(SMSgt, USAF, Retired)
To: yesthatjallen
classified information being systematically, deliberately mishandled.
So, criminal negligence, and not conclusive cases of espionage.
27 posted on
10/20/2019 9:54:37 PM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson