Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Is Speaker Pelosi Delaying a Full House Vote on the Impeachment Inquiry?
PJ Media ^ | 10/16/2019 | Rick Moran

Posted on 10/16/2019 8:31:04 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: SeekAndFind

“He didn’t mention that the “process arguments” are “constitutional process” arguments. “

Hogwash.

Unmitigated bullsh!t.

This argument on the right that the House is bound to historic procedures is ludicrous, an argument for the ignorant.

Every two years there is another Congress. And every Congress can make their own procedural rules, to include impeachment.

What happens prior to that yes/no vote is immaterial and there is no authority on earth that can compel the House otherwise.


41 posted on 10/16/2019 9:23:42 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolutionary

“Justice Roberts”

Has no authority whatsoever in an impeachment.

His role is purely ceremonial.


42 posted on 10/16/2019 9:26:22 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

House rules have no bearing whatsoever.

Every Congress makes their own rules and is not bound by previous rules.


43 posted on 10/16/2019 9:27:43 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Revolutionary

Or the Senate can pass a rule that requires any impeachment re feral follow a specific method before it be accepted.

- require a recorded vote of the full house before the impeachment proceedings begin.
- require that the target of the impeachment be granted the same due process as afforded in the courts to grand jury proceedings.

etc.


44 posted on 10/16/2019 9:29:38 AM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
"Every Congress makes their own rules and is not bound by previous rules."

But they have to vote on that to do it.

45 posted on 10/16/2019 9:31:15 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

“But they have to vote on that to do it. “

No, they don’t.

They can choose to operate entirely without any rules, ignoring all past rules, and never hold a vote on it.

And there’s no authority on earth that can say otherwise.

Well, except the voters. And each House member must face the voters every two years.


46 posted on 10/16/2019 9:34:57 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Because she is trying to salvage some of the savable rat seats. She knows it will be a disaster for the rodents; so in the end she will use the excuse she she is even now trying to think up to not do it and save face.


47 posted on 10/16/2019 9:35:54 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Then if they choose to just ignore the existing rules then it will be the end of any house procedural rules. Because in your scenario all established procedural rules do is limit the party in power setting them. Thus, why have them at all. Not disagreeing with you here on the reality of a pure power play, just mourning the death of the republic.


48 posted on 10/16/2019 9:39:22 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“What is Speaker Nancy Pelosi worried about?”?
Pelosi is afraid to have her members who are in traditionally red districts vote for impeachment as they already are on shakey ground when it comes to their re-elections.
That along with giving republicans some power in the the whole shebang.


49 posted on 10/16/2019 9:43:11 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ( Molon Labe' baby, Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

we need to notify our representatives that since they are conducting an inquiry without a vote we will assume they voted for the inquiry and remember it at election time..take the offensive..

Our congressional leaders and President Trump should publicize this..imo
no vote = support for impeachment


50 posted on 10/16/2019 9:48:30 AM PDT by rolling_stone (no justice no peace and leakers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

“Pelosi is afraid to have her members who are in traditionally red districts vote for impeachment as they already are on shakey ground when it comes to their re-elections.”

Which shows they never intended to hold an up/down impeachment vote prior to the election.


51 posted on 10/16/2019 9:48:45 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Correct.
NOt their intentions.
Simply want the ability to continually show The Donald in unflattering light to stroke their base.


52 posted on 10/16/2019 10:00:47 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ( Molon Labe' baby, Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

They have a new hit piece on Trump now.
https://apple.news/AvpIjcTLmT3aZ6upBH4SV6w


53 posted on 10/16/2019 10:08:48 AM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Can’t the Republicans in the house call for a vote? Seems to me even putting forth a motion to vote on the vote would drive the Democrats into the sunlight and scald ‘em.


54 posted on 10/16/2019 10:13:52 AM PDT by Retrofitted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why, is she delaying it? Because she knows it will energize Republicans and most independents and bury the Democratic Party sweeping her out of all the money and power she has as Speaker of the House.


55 posted on 10/16/2019 10:51:06 AM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I wonder if Pelosi was just waiting for the DNC presidential debates to end so that none of the candidates would have to comment on the vote. They all seem to be “For” impeachment. But if a vote were actually taken there would be immediate feedback from the public that would only really take shape a couple of weeks later — meanwhile Joe, Kamala, Lizzy & Bernie have all “taken a position” that might be repudiated by the voting public.


56 posted on 10/16/2019 11:43:35 AM PDT by Tallguy (Facts be d@mned! The narrative must be protected at all costs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Is this what they are hoping for?
https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-inc-podcast-never-before-seen-trump-tax-documents-show-major-inconsistencies


57 posted on 10/16/2019 11:59:39 AM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson