Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Rules Trump Violated the Law on Wall Funding With National Emergency
NBC San Diego ^ | Oct 11 2019 | NBC San Diego

Posted on 10/11/2019 2:48:43 PM PDT by rintintin

A federal judge ruled Friday that President Donald Trump violated federal law when he used his declaration of a national emergency to get millions for building a wall on the southern border, NBC News reports.

The ruling is a victory for El Paso County, Texas, and the Border Network for Human Rights, which sued to stop border construction in their community. They argued that Trump had no legal authority to spend more than what Congress appropriated for the wall project.

In January the president asked for $5.7 billion to build "a steel barrier for the Southwest border," but Congress approved only $1.375 billion. In February, Trump declared a national emergency and ordered that money for Pentagon construction projects would be used instead for the wall.

Federal District Court Judge David Briones said the president's order violated a provision of the budget law approved by Congress which said "none of the funds made available in this or any other appropriation may be used to increase" the funding for the wall project.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcsandiego.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: 3rdthread; aliens; border; davidbriones; judiciary; politicaljudiciary; rapinbilljudge; wall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
I’m not sure the judge is wrong about this

When Trump signed that budget bill that forbade use of funds for the wall, I remember Coulter warning he was effectively killing the wall

Another reminder that GOP leadership in Congress has worked hard and well to sabotage the MAGA agenda. And Trump hasn’t fought them hard enough

1 posted on 10/11/2019 2:48:43 PM PDT by rintintin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rintintin

Hasn’t this already been addressed at the SCOTUS?


2 posted on 10/11/2019 2:52:04 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

Clinton judge. Would’ve happened with or without that Bill.


3 posted on 10/11/2019 2:52:07 PM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell..?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

The judge....anyone wanna bet he’s (or she) a Clinton or Obama appointee?


4 posted on 10/11/2019 2:52:32 PM PDT by Kevin in California
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

Obama can issue whatever executive orders he liked and no one cared.


5 posted on 10/11/2019 2:52:33 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintintin
A federal judge ruled Friday ...

Why am I not f*cking surprised!? Why not on a Monday or Tuesday or Wednesday or Thursday?

6 posted on 10/11/2019 2:52:35 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

Yawn. District Court Judge. Administration will appeal and will win.


7 posted on 10/11/2019 2:52:43 PM PDT by Vesparado (The American people know what they want and they deserve to get it good and hard --- HL Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

That was Pentagon funding. We won that one.


8 posted on 10/11/2019 2:53:06 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

Speed bump.


9 posted on 10/11/2019 2:53:08 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Oops, he.


10 posted on 10/11/2019 2:53:24 PM PDT by Kevin in California
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vesparado

I thought this issue has already been addressed by SCOTUS?


11 posted on 10/11/2019 2:55:28 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Yes. This is another one of the 80% or so of Clinton/obama appointed judges decisions that will eventually get overturned by higher courts.


12 posted on 10/11/2019 2:56:09 PM PDT by fatman6502002 ((The Team The Team The Team - Bo Schembechler circa 1969))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

A Clinton appointment.

Judges appointed by Clinton and Obama should not be allowed to rule on Trump cases.


13 posted on 10/11/2019 2:57:57 PM PDT by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase
Thank you. Please check this out though.

From this article:

In January the president asked for $5.7 billion to build "a steel barrier for the Southwest border," but Congress approved only $1.375 billion. In February, Trump declared a national emergency and ordered that money for Pentagon construction projects would be used instead for the wall.

Federal District Court Judge David Briones said the president's order violated a provision of the budget law approved by Congress which said "none of the funds made available in this or any other appropriation may be used to increase" the funding for the wall project.

So we're still talking about redirected Pentagon funds.

My take is that the only way that previous ruling doesn't apply now, is if this case is siting different grounds for a violation, which the SCOTUS could then agree with.

14 posted on 10/11/2019 3:04:07 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fatman6502002

See if this makes sense.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3785459/posts?page=12#12


15 posted on 10/11/2019 3:05:25 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

16 posted on 10/11/2019 3:08:39 PM PDT by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatman6502002

Sick to death of these liberal judges ruling by fiat for the rest of us. We should round these judges up and force them to live on the border.


17 posted on 10/11/2019 3:10:51 PM PDT by Metrobank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

The budget law cannot overrule the emergency act.


18 posted on 10/11/2019 3:10:52 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

“When Trump signed that budget bill that forbade use of funds for the wall, I remember Coulter warning he was effectively killing the wall “

Coulter! LOL!


19 posted on 10/11/2019 3:11:45 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

When is Judge Nap going to MSNBC.

The only time Fox News is quoted is when MSNBC agrees with them or when Fox embarrassed itself.


20 posted on 10/11/2019 3:12:06 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson