To: Oldeconomybuyer
This org gets hundreds of millions of federal funding. This should be a FEC violation.
2 posted on
10/09/2019 11:10:03 AM PDT by
NohSpinZone
(First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Killing babies is not reproductive health
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Weird. Someone we know recently had a birthday and suggested donating to pph instead of a gift. How stupid must these assclowns be? What kind of salary did their recently retired CEO make? Crappy retirement pkg? Prolly not.
4 posted on
10/09/2019 11:14:24 AM PDT by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Well all of that money WOULD let you reach voters.
IF you had not aborted them all.
5 posted on
10/09/2019 11:15:12 AM PDT by
Buckeye McFrog
(Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
if they have this much money lying around then there is no need for any federal funding. . . . .
6 posted on
10/09/2019 11:16:40 AM PDT by
Godzilla
( I just love the smell of COVFEFE in the morning . . . .)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Planned Parenthood announced on Wednesday it plans to spend at least $45 million ahead of the 2020 elections, the most it has ever spent during an election cycle.
That's $15 million more than the entire Carter-Mondale campaign spent to win in 1976.
8 posted on
10/09/2019 11:17:54 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(Sutor, ne ultra crepidam--Appelles of Kos)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
our federal taxes paying for the mass-murder of innocent babies....and all this corruption lobbying
congress forces us to pay fed income taxes
congress gives $$$$ of it to PP
PP gives $$$ of it back to congress
everyone skims off their “share” and gets rich off our taxes
(and the babies keep getting slaughtered)
9 posted on
10/09/2019 11:26:12 AM PDT by
faithhopecharity
( “Politicians are not , born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I hope none of that is tax payer monies.
11 posted on
10/09/2019 11:41:24 AM PDT by
Harpotoo
(Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Which should prove the lie that they’re all about health.
They’re a PAC with services.
13 posted on
10/09/2019 11:56:26 AM PDT by
Skywise
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Our tax dollars at work - against us.
16 posted on
10/09/2019 12:12:07 PM PDT by
\/\/ayne
(I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Something is rotten in Denmark. They spend 45 million in elections, to get people elected that will FUND THEM?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"We'd damn well better increase our income flow! Work harder! Get more women into those clinics - those baby parts won't just sell themselves!"
21 posted on
10/09/2019 12:16:27 PM PDT by
COBOL2Java
(Hillary Clinton: Just like Joe with only half the dementia.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This year...its not going to help.
The RATS have no candidate who can win...so far.
23 posted on
10/09/2019 12:53:22 PM PDT by
Zathras
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“We are primarily a health care provider,” said Johnson, president and chief executive officer...
If this were true, PP wouldn’t need to spend millions each election cycle. No one is lobbying to put Doctors Without Borders out of commission.
They are an abortion business. Period.
24 posted on
10/09/2019 12:58:29 PM PDT by
ConservativeWarrior
(Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
o they get federal money and then spend it on election?
26 posted on
10/09/2019 1:19:20 PM PDT by
b4me
(God Bless the USA)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
One more reason why to cut their government funding.
It’s a travesty to allow them to push for their sordid world view, with our tax dollars.
27 posted on
10/09/2019 1:28:51 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(This space for rent.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson