[Sacajaweau]

Move your clinic closer to the hospital. I’m guessing you’re only renting space as it is.

[Galactica]

He will side with the liberal wing to show how sensitive he is

[MeganC]

This is just reasonable common sense abortion control. Any rational person should support this and only woman-hating radicals would want to support dangerous and risky abortion practices!

[Robert357]

I would be surprised if much of Roe vs Wade is overturned. The reason I say that is the liberals have totally forgotten what that was about and in their twisted minds turned into a right to perform infanticide after birth and harvest body parts.

My limited understanding is that it give the power to the State's to regulate what can happen in early pregnancies. Well, the laws that do that, ie. it if there is a heartbeat, requiring licensed medical doctors to perform medical procedures, requiring the abortion to be in a licensed medical facility, requiring any human remains to be treated with dignity as human remains, are all the things states have a right to regulate.

The liberals heads are going to start exploding when the ruling comes down by the Supreme Court as their “Holy Grail of death” is not really what they think it is.

[eyeamok]

It sounds like their argument is:

If Women have to die to keep killing babies, then so be it.

[Amendment10]

"When Susan Collins said she was going to vote for his confirmation, in her speech she mentioned that in their meeting, he assured her that he would not overturn the Roe v. Wade precedent."

Then Judge Kavanaugh should never have never given a misguided, post-17th Amendment ratification senator such assurance.

Constitution-savvy grade school children could probably tell us that, since the states have never expressly constitutionally limited themselves with respect to the law in question, the law is based on constitutionally unchecked 10th Amendment-protected state powers — it is constitutional imo.

In fact, with all due respect to the family and friends of the late Terri Schiavo, based on what the public knows about this life and death issue case, the Supreme Court should respect state sovereignty like it did in Terri’s case imo.

The main reason that state sovereignty is now being wrongly arbitrarily ignored by activist justices and justices is the following imo.

Using inappropriate words like "concept" and "implicit" here is what was left of 10A-protected state sovereignty after FDR’s state sovereignty-ignoring majority justices got finished with it in Wickard v. Filburn.

• "10th Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

• "In discussion and decision, the point of reference, instead of being what was "necessary and proper" to the exercise by Congress of its granted power, was often some concept [???] of sovereignty thought to be implicit [??? emphases added] in the status of statehood." —Wickard v. Filburn, 1942.

Let’s see how institutionally indoctrinated Justice Kavanaugh is.

Remember in November 2020!

MAGA! Now KAG! (Keep America Great!)

[ought-six]

Kavanaugh will side with the libs on this one, I’m afraid. Hell, so may Roberts.

[backwoods-engineer]

I pray he rules for burning down every abortuary in the Republic.

I can dream, right?