It doesn’t matter what I think.
The WB said he had direct knowledge of some of the acts (for some bizarre reason you have an issue when I say alleged acts).
The IG determined that his claim in that regard was credible. In the IG’s judgment the WB had direct knowledge.
Given those two facts it doesn’t matter what the forms said and there would have been no benefit to anyone to have changed them.
I agree. However, what you say is a different matter.
The WB said he had direct knowledge of some of the acts (for some bizarre reason you have an issue when I say alleged acts).
Sorry, alleged conduct is not the same as alleged acts. Or do you not realize that?
In the IG’s judgment the WB had direct knowledge.
SO! Do you believe everything every government employee says.
I sure as hell don't.