I agree. However, what you say is a different matter.
The WB said he had direct knowledge of some of the acts (for some bizarre reason you have an issue when I say alleged acts).
Sorry, alleged conduct is not the same as alleged acts. Or do you not realize that?
In the IG’s judgment the WB had direct knowledge.
SO! Do you believe everything every government employee says.
I sure as hell don't.
Conduct manifests itself in acts.
SO! Do you believe everything every government employee says.
No, but we’ve already established that it doesn’t matter what I think.
Or are you going to now pounce on the crucial difference between think and believe as if anyone would take it seriously.