Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Magnatron

Not “whistleblower”, just rumor/gossip passer. No first hand knowledge, just passed along office gossip.


11 posted on 09/30/2019 5:06:24 AM PDT by Bulwinkle (, a.k.a. Daffy Duck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bulwinkle
I think the whistleblower is lying....that he/she/it.....did some hacking and that there are NOT 10 or 12 persons involved.

NOTE: Someone provided the President with "Cliff Notes" BEFORE the phone call.

The President has an extraordinary memory....but Crowdstrike and the surrounding scenario is so vague.

Find out who WROTE the Cliff Notes for him. That's one....of probably 3 perps.

Hacker, attorney, delivery boy aka whistleblower.

I'm betting he won't testify because he knows the least of the suggested 3 perps...aka....spies.

23 posted on 09/30/2019 7:11:00 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Bulwinkle

And how in the hell is this complaint, based on hearsay, “urgent?” The “whistleblower” used a form for “urgent” matters. This “urgent” form was recently changed by the deep state to allow hearsay. Why couldn’t the WB use a normal complaint, or at least make a case that he/she didn’t invent the “sources?”


24 posted on 09/30/2019 7:12:07 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson