It’s government-granted monopolies that are the problem.
I believe there is a Grassley-Wyden drug bill too.
What might be done is to have Medicare Part D plans buy on an all the doctors prescribe basis with typical co-pays 95+x% of the federal Medicare Part D subsidy amount, where x is insurer chosen. Plan buyers would pay the x% as a premium. The 5% would be insurer overhead and profit.
Not every drug or every drug class need be covered, but in practice there would be few exceptions.
No drug company would want to be left behind. No insurer would want gaps in its coverage.
Part B drug coverage would be eliminated in year 2 and the federal Part D subsidy increased to allow Part D coverage to be expanded.
This leaves price setting to the marketplace.
“notion... drugs are expensive”
$50000/year/patient
$1.5 million/year/patient
What should a politician think of such pricing?
Price controls are ALWAYS a bad idea!
95% tax on Prescriptions https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/nancy-pelosi-unveils-95-tax-proposal-on-prescription-medicines?fbclid=IwAR1qTewrpVaR-RazUyofrCIZYx4gMBaCpay0KbfIn99T-sQMCyETonLIsZU
My dad has metastatic prostate cancer, fortunately in remission. He gets Lupron injections every four months. When he switched from getting his injections from his urologist to his oncologist the cost of the injections billed to his insurance went from $2,400 to $87,500. Needless to say he kept seeing his oncologist and went back to his urologist for his injections. Government isn’t necessarily the problem in this area.
How about the gov’t / taxpayers pay the cost of research once the drug is ok’d for use. The price should be a lot lower.