Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: COUNTrecount

Due for another schlonging.


2 posted on 09/29/2019 9:14:38 AM PDT by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gundog

15 posted on 09/29/2019 9:21:02 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: gundog

I read the Daily Mail comments, but not the article. People DETEST her, have very funny things to say. “Encourage her so we can watch her lose again.”


29 posted on 09/29/2019 9:26:10 AM PDT by Veto! (Political Correctness Offends Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: gundog

30 posted on 09/29/2019 9:27:14 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: gundog


32 posted on 09/29/2019 9:29:50 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: gundog

They’re terrified.

September 28 at 7:47 PM

The Trump administration is investigating the email records of dozens of current and former senior State Department officials who sent messages to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email, reviving a politically toxic matter that overshadowed the 2016 election, current and former officials said.

As many as 130 officials have been contacted in recent weeks by State Department investigators — a list that includes senior officials who reported directly to Clinton as well as others in lower-level jobs whose emails were at some point relayed to her inbox, said current and former State Department officials. Those targeted were notified that emails they sent years ago have been retroactively classified and now constitute potential security violations, according to letters reviewed by The Washington Post.

In virtually all of the cases, potentially sensitive information, now recategorized as “classified,” was sent to Clinton’s unsecure inbox.

State Department investigators began contacting the former officials about 18 months ago, after President Trump’s election, and then seemed to drop the effort before picking it up in August, officials said.

Senior State Department officials said that they are following standard protocol in an investigation that began during the latter days of the Obama administration and is nearing completion.

“This has nothing to do with who is in the White House,” said a senior State Department official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about an ongoing probe. “This is about the time it took to go through millions of emails, which is about 3½ years.”

To many of those under scrutiny, including some of the Democratic Party’s top foreign policy experts, the recent flurry of activity surrounding the Clinton email case represents a new front on which the Trump administration could be accused of employing the powers of the executive branch against perceived political adversaries.

The existence of the probe follows revelations that the president used multiple levers of his office to pressure the leader of Ukraine to pursue investigations that Trump hoped would produce damaging information about Democrats, including potential presidential rival Joe Biden.

[Trump offered Ukrainian president Justice Dept. help on Biden, memo shows] State Department officials vigorously denied there was any political motivation behind their actions, and said that the reviews of retroactively classified emails were conducted by career bureaucrats who did not know the names of the subjects being investigated.

“The process is set up in a manner to completely avoid any appearance of political bias,” said a second senior State Department official, who was speaking on condition of anonymity to describe the mechanics of an internal probe.

Clinton’s use of a private email server during her term as secretary triggered multiple investigations by the State Department, the FBI and Congress. The bureau did not accuse her of breaking the law, but she blamed the FBI’s unusual public handling of the matter as a major factor in her loss in the 2016 election.

“I’d like to think that this is just routine, but something strange is going on,” said Jeffrey Feltman, a former assistant secretary for Near East Affairs.

In early 2018 Feltman received a letter informing him that a half dozen of his messages included classified information.

Then a few weeks ago he was found culpable for more than 50 emails that contained classified information.

“A couple of the emails cited by State as problems were sent after my May 2012 retirement, when I was already working for the United Nations,” he said.

A former senior U.S. official familiar with the email investigation described it as a way for Republicans “to keep the Clinton email issue alive.”

The former official said the probe was “a way to tarnish a whole bunch of Democratic foreign policy people” and discourage if not prevent them from returning to government service.

The probe is being carried out by investigators from the State Department’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security. Republican lawmakers, led by Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), have been pressing Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to complete the review of classified information sent to Clinton’s private emails and report back to Congress.

State Department officials said they were bound by law to adjudicate any violations. Former Obama administration officials, however, described the probe as a remarkably aggressive crackdown by an administration with its own troubled record of handling classified material. Trump has improperly disclosed classified information to foreign officials and used phones that national security officials warned were vulnerable to foreign surveillance, according to current and former officials.

At the same time, Trump overrode the concerns of his former White House chief of staff and U.S. intelligence officials to give his son-in-law and senior White House adviser Jared Kushner access to highly classified materials, officials said.

https://archive.fo/M17BN
https://i.imgur.com/3up5NfK.png


52 posted on 09/29/2019 9:45:45 AM PDT by COUNTrecount (If only Harvey Weinstein's bathrobe could talk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: gundog

I’m calling it:....She will be fake Pocahontas VP! They had a meeting not to long ago and I bet you dollars to donuts they discussed the VP spot..she’ll slither her way back into politics one way or the other..BANK ON IT!!


54 posted on 09/29/2019 9:47:37 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: gundog

Due for another schlonging without even a kiss!


59 posted on 09/29/2019 9:54:03 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (The line that separates satire and Democrats and Stupidity has vanished. (thranks to jonascord)! <B)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson