[Swordmaker]

Did any one notice that the new form besides not having a correct required government revision date, in the correct format, it doesn’t meet the standard government requirement of having the correct government form name and form number?

The true government form has in its Header and Footer:

Header:

IC IG
Urgent Concern Disclosure Form
Page ii

Footer:

IC IG ICWSP Form 401 (then at the far right) Rev. 24MAY18

The new likely bogus and fraudulent non-government counterfeit form, has in its Header and Footer:

Header:

(IC IG LOGO then, in all upper case) DISCLOSURE OF URGENT CONCERN FORM(No page number)

Footer:

IC IG CPD – ICWSP Disclosure Form (then at the far right) Rev: August 2019

In the Header of the new form, on what has to be a second page, a logo in the header is usually not done, and page numbers are required on a gov’t form yet this one has none. The form’s name has been changed from the previous form’s four word “Urgent Concern Disclosure Form" to five words "DISCLOSURE OF URGENT CONCERN FORM", along with the "I heard it through the grapevine" loose rumor reporting criteria being added.

The very NAME of the form on the footer is even more INCORRECT, and there is no official form number [!], and as in the header, there is no page number indicating this is what page of what number of pages in the entire form, usually a requirements there are multiple pages. Note that the colon after the "Rev" is not a standard government form date pattern which requires a period making it an abbreviation. Finally, what is The "CPD” in the footer’s "IC IG CPDICWSP Disclosure Form"? Where did those three initials come from? they don’t exist on the 24MAY18 form.

Everything about this form screams it hasn’t gone through a full approval process. It’s sloppy. Most likely it’s an ad hoc creation of some young staffer to meet an urgent need to provide verisimilitude to the bogus "whistleblower" assertions when someone noticed the old form required firsthand knowledge. It was cranked out fast by someone not versed in required government form standards.

[Chgogal]

Bookmark

[palmer]

along with the "I heard it through the grapevine" loose rumor reporting criteria being added.

No, that is not correct. See my previous posts. Both versions of the form allow hearing through the grapevine. But the new version took out the instructions that an urgent complaint must be first hand knowledge. The old form had those instructions. Both versions have a checkbox for first hand and second hand knowledge.

[Jane Long]

Thanks for this information.

Reminds me of Dan Ra^ther's big find AND 0bama's Birth "Certificate"