Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Carbon Dioxide Known Only Since 1930
American Thinker ^ | September 25, 2019 | Jonathon Moseley

Posted on 09/25/2019 1:32:09 AM PDT by Moseley

We do not know how much carbon dioxide was in Earth's atmosphere prior to the 1930s. Devices to measure carbon dioxide went through a difficult, slow, irregular development. Reliable devices to measure carbon dioxide were available around 1930.

"The measurement of carbon dioxide (CO2) was first developed in the early 1900s; however, it was complex and of limited clinical use. " See: Thomas Nowicki; Shawn London, "Carbon Dioxide Detector," National Center for Biotechnology Information. The technology was slowly developed and produced a useable machine only around the year 1930.

Guy Stewart Callendar -- who dreamed up the global warming scare -- rejected nearly all CO2 measurements before 1870 because of “relatively crude instrumentation” and recognized only twelve suitable data sets in the 20th century. Callendar, G.P. “On the Amount of Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere,” Tellus 10: 243-48. (1958).

"In 1939, August Herman Pfund (1879–1949) developed a respiratory gas analyzer that was used at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore to measure carbon monoxide and CO2. " Pfund AH, Gemmill CL. "An infrared absorption method for the quantitative analysis of respiratory and other gases," Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp, 1940;67:61–5.

We cannot measure carbon dioxide content of the Earth's past from air pockets in ice core samples. First, gases can diffuse through solid walls. Buy a helium balloon. A week later the balloon will no longer be floating but on the ground. The helium gas diffuses out through the walls. We know that gas does not stay unchanged even in a closed container.

Second, over thousands of years, gases in the ice core will be changed by non-organic chemical reactions or by microscopic plant life like algae or microbes. As the weight of accumulating layers presses from above, gases will be forced into the ice core.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: airpockets; carbondioxide; co2; globalwarming; icecore
"Bacteria form in the ice releasing gases even in 500,000-year-old ice at great depth. Brent C. Christner, “Detection, Recovery, Isolation and Characterization of Bacteria in Glacial Ice and Lake Vostok Accretion Ice,” Dissertation. Ohio State University, 2002.

Testimony before the U.S. Senate made this clear in 2004:

Determinations of CO2 in polar ice cores are commonly used for estimations of the pre-industrial CO2 atmospheric levels. Perusal of these determinations convinced me that glaciological studies are not able to provide a reliable reconstruction of CO2 concentrations in the ancient atmosphere. This is because the ice cores do not fulfill the essential closed system criteria. * * * More than 20 physico-chemical processes, mostly related to the presence of liquid water, contribute to the alteration of the original chemical composition of the air inclusions in polar ice[3].

One of these processes is formation of gas hydrates or clathrates. In the highly compressed deep ice all air bubbles disappear, as under the influence of pressure the gases change into the solid clathrates, which are tiny crystals formed by interaction of gas with water molecules. Drilling decompresses cores excavated from deep ice, and contaminates them with the drilling fluid filling the borehole. * * * After decompression of the ice cores, the solid clathrates decompose into a gas form, exploding in the process as if they were microscopic grenades. In the bubble-free ice the explosions form a new gas cavities and new cracks[4]. Through these cracks, and cracks formed by sheeting, a part of gas escapes first into the drilling liquid which fills the borehole, and then at the surface to the atmospheric air.

Particular gases, CO2, O2 and N2 trapped in the deep cold ice start to form clathrates, and leave the air bubbles, at different pressures and depth. At the ice temperature of –15oC dissociation pressure for N2 is about 100 bars, for O2 75 bars, and for CO2 5 bars. Formation of CO2 clathrates starts in the ice sheets at about 200 meter depth, and that of O2 and N2 at 600 to 1000 meters.

This leads to depletion of CO2 in the gas trapped in the ice sheets. This is why the records of CO2 concentration in the gas inclusions from deep polar ice show the values lower than in the contemporary atmosphere, even for the epochs when the global surface temperature was higher than now. -- Prof. Zbigniew Jaworowski. Chairman, Scientific Council of Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection, Warsaw, Poland, Statement before the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, March 19, 2004

http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Calen5/JawoCO2-Eng.html

1 posted on 09/25/2019 1:32:09 AM PDT by Moseley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Moseley

http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Calen5/JawoCO2-Eng.html


2 posted on 09/25/2019 1:33:18 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyReport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Don’t distract us with facts. We’re sure humans are affecting the weather, or something.


3 posted on 09/25/2019 3:21:59 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Bttt


4 posted on 09/25/2019 3:56:18 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

1970’s - 1990’s:

Climate theory and groundwork propaganda formulated with fear-mongering and chastising those not jumping on the bandwagon of the scientism (using actual science words, terms and phrases in a construct to project a totally false series of statements).

1990’s - 2000’s:

Further chastising those not buying into now customized computer simulations and model DESIGNED to produce the desired results instead of letting the FACTS determine truth. Conversion point of climate theory into a religion of climate.

2000’s - Pres.:

Conversion of religion of climate into the THEOCRACY OF CLIMATE that all nations MUST surrender their governments to.


5 posted on 09/25/2019 4:13:47 AM PDT by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

So, don’t use ice core samples.

Use the fossil remains of flora and fauna, while living, absorbed trace elements (isotopes) that can now be measured and dated accurately.

Sea floor core samples would be the better choice.


6 posted on 09/25/2019 5:29:06 AM PDT by Doctor DNA (retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor DNA

What’s your margin of error for measuring plant remains?

What local conditions affect them?

what is the consistency of plant remains over time and around the world?


7 posted on 09/25/2019 5:47:14 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyReport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma

Don’t forget plastic bags were not invented until recently and then the world almost collapse until we had to pay .10 a piece for them with the kickbacks to the democrat party.....


8 posted on 09/25/2019 5:59:52 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

Banned as of 2020 in my state.


9 posted on 09/25/2019 8:53:17 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma

“Don’t distract us with facts. We’re sure humans are affecting the weather, or something.”

I have known many humans who were under the weather as well as some who had three sheets in the wind.


10 posted on 09/25/2019 1:23:47 PM PDT by RipSawyer (I need some green first and then we'll talk a new deal!http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3763)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

I have at times been under the weather myself and possibly three sheets in an earlier time.


11 posted on 09/25/2019 3:06:37 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson