Identify this person. Not having heard the conversation directly, he or she only heard about it from another source.
There is no whistle blower, only a partisan hack with an axe to grind and so there should be no “whistle blower” protection given.
He doesn’t qualify for whistle blower protection anyway. He has no direct knowledge. And the statute only authorizes protection against the agency not the President.
If the fake whistleblower's name is outed in a way that could plausibly be pinned on Trump that will be the next fake impeachable offense and the next "crisis that shakes the foundation of the republic to it's core." of the week.
Let the nameless snake remain nameless and speak through a Clinton lackey lawyer until they can't bear to be missing out on their fifteen minutes of fame and the possibility of being a leftist folk hero by bringing down the bad orange man.
I suspect they were still wiretapping or otherwise eavesdropping on the president at that point. This is being called third-party hearsay as the deep state spy cannot admit to illegally spying on Trump. Just another dirty dossier to start another inquiry.
Whistleblower laws violate the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment
WHO LEAKED the conversation to the “whistleblower”??