Posted on 09/24/2019 7:06:59 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
A highly qualified and experienced climate modeler with impeccable credentials has rejected the unscientific bases of the doom-mongering over a purported climate crisis. His work has not yet been picked up in this country, but that is about to change, Writing in the Australian site Quadrant, Tony Thomas introduces the English-Speaking world to the truth-telling of Dr. Mototaka Nakamura. (hat tip: Andrew Bolt, John McMahon)
There’s a top-level oceanographer and meteorologist who is prepared to cry “Nonsense!”on the “global warming crisis” evident to climate modellers but not in the real world. He’s as well or better qualified than the modellers he criticises — the ones whose Year 2100 forebodings of 4degC warming have set the world to spending $US1.5 trillion a year to combat CO2 emissions.
The iconoclast is Dr. Mototaka Nakamura. In June he put out a small book in Japanese on “the sorry state of climate science”. It’s titled Confessions of a climate scientist: the global warming hypothesis is an unproven hypothesis, and he is very much qualified to take a stand. From 1990 to 2014 he worked on cloud dynamics and forces mixing atmospheric and ocean flows on medium to planetary scales. His bases were MIT (for a Doctor of Science in meteorology), Georgia Institute of Technology, Goddard Space Flight Centre, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Duke and Hawaii Universities and the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology. He’s published about 20 climate papers on fluid dynamics.[i]
Today’s vast panoply of “global warming science” is like an upside down pyramid built on the work of a few score of serious climate modellers. They claim to have demonstrated human-derived CO2 emissions as the cause of recent global warming and project that warming forward.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I clicked on your Amazon link and it came up amazon.de ... nothing in English there ...
bkmk
That has been the problem for awhile now. We cannot get Temps that have NOT been doctored. Whole sets of data have been changed or even erased. There is no trust anywhere.
Just recently, I looked up Hurricane Carla from 1961 as I've been told all my life it was one of the most powerful ever measured @ 175 mph. Some web sites say that, yet others are saying now it might have been only a Cat 3-4 when it hit. They even admitted they were "re-figuring" the numbers. How and why would you want to re-figure eyewitness accounts unless you need the data to be worse now than then? For 50 years Carla was among the top 5 hurricanes ever recorded, now they are lowering the measured wind speeds. ......Why?
I will concede the recent storm that hit Bermuda was the most powerful one I've ever heard of in my 68 years, but why would that necessitate lowering other storms insisting that hundreds of other eyewitnesses had to be mistaken?
Climate Scientists (500 of them) Write To UN: There Is No Climate Emergency
https://www.technocracy.news/climate-scientists-write-to-un-there-is-no-climate-emergency/
Yes, it does say “Japanese”, but at least it says Japanese in English, not in German or whatever language that was on the first post’s link.
My Kindle took longer than I thought it would to download the pages. So far it has downloaded about 80% of the book. Most of it seems to be in Japanese, however, there is an essay at the very beginning that is in English, and it’s about 8 pages long. The author also provides resources to 18 of his published peer reviewed articles.
Try this link. Parts of it are in English.
So he is a scientist and has perfect credentials. Big deal. Has he ever spoke to the UN ? Or cried at a podium ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.