Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billorites

Democrats started a civil war in in 1861. They did so on the basic premise that cheap labor was good for America. The only thing that stopped in 1865 was the shooting.


2 posted on 09/20/2019 5:28:54 PM PDT by jmacusa ("If wisdom is not the Lord, what is wisdom?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jmacusa

‘They did so on the basic premise that cheap labor was good for America.’

no no no...if you’ve been reading FR you’d rightly know that the CW started over the north being meanies about tariffs...


5 posted on 09/20/2019 6:09:59 PM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jmacusa
Democrats started a civil war in in 1861. They did so on the basic premise that cheap labor was good for America. The only thing that stopped in 1865 was the shooting.

Actually, it might be more realistic to suggest that the then-new Republican Party started a civil war in 1861, on the basic premise that a State, once acceeding to union, could never depart (although the Constitution nowhere prohibited State seccession).

The Democratic Party of that era was the 'constitutional party,' and generally promoted a literal or strict interpretation of the compact. The Republican Party of that time leaned towards actions based on feelings of moral outrage, rather than constitutional law. The party names have remained the same, but their philosophies have changed. IIRC, Ronald Reagan observed: "I didn't leave the Democratic Party. The party left me." Today's political parties are not even the same as those our grandparents voted for...

11 posted on 09/21/2019 6:55:11 AM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("He therefore who may resist, must be allowed to strike.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson