Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OrangeHoof

Isn’t the fact the charges are being made forty years later, with no corroboration, prima facie evidence of malice aforethought? Why else would they be doing it?

Balsey Ford’s lawyer let it slip the purpose for making her charge was to put an asterisk next to his name. In other words, to dirty his reputation.


14 posted on 09/15/2019 11:41:20 PM PDT by JohnnyP (Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: JohnnyP

No, it’s not proof. Proof would be a produced statement admissable in court that says “Let me fabricate a story so as to derail his nomination.”


15 posted on 09/16/2019 6:38:57 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (Trump is Making the Media Grate Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson