Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Lawmakers Move to Keep Landlords From Refusing Low-Income Renters
ktla ^ | 09/12/2019

Posted on 09/12/2019 1:18:47 PM PDT by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: kaehurowing; BenLurkin
California landlords would no longer be allowed to reject prospective tenants solely because they hold federal Section 8 housing vouchers under a bill passed by the state Legislature on Wednesday.

My guess is these legislators have never rented to a section 8 family.

Yah, you get your rent but it doesn’t make up for the damage they do.

Then when they leave and move on to destroy someone else’s property they leave your house full of trash and filth.

You are typically in the hole at least a few thousand dollars of repairs and clean up. Probably some pest control services as well.

Most of these vermin don’t care about your property because they know that they will not be held responsible for the damage they do.

21 posted on 09/12/2019 1:39:12 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

exactamundo!


22 posted on 09/12/2019 1:39:35 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I have a niece. 35 years old. 2 kids. 2 different Daddy’s and has Section 8 housing. They live in an Apartment.

She has never had a job, only source of income is child support of 1 of the Daddy’s and of course government help.

She’s has NEVER had a job. I doubt if she ever will.

So what happens to her when she is 50 an both kids are gone. Does she still get government money?

And if that’s the case, why do we have ANY homeless?


23 posted on 09/12/2019 1:40:02 PM PDT by skinndogNN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Property Rights??

Only for ME and NOT for thee!

Commiefornia. Giving true meaning to the term “Third World Sh*thole”.


24 posted on 09/12/2019 1:41:51 PM PDT by Howie66 ("...Against All Enemies, Foreign and Democrat.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I see a potiential business model here. A firm could provide a rental history check. In essence, a landlord could require the prospective rentor to go to a third party for a rating as to their history of renting. Model it after a credit score.

Renter would have to apply and would be required to fill out an online form, agency would then check with prior landlords / appartment complexes. Some type of rating system. Leave an appartment trashed and your score is lowered. Have the police frequently called out, again lowered. No complaints, keep the place clean, pay your bills, higher score.


25 posted on 09/12/2019 1:42:32 PM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

“One way around it is to require a high minimum credit score of ALL applicants, but if you’re caught waiving it for the “right” tenant you can be hauled into court and fined”

I wonder what THE STATE WILL ALLOW in terms of the amount of security deposit that can be requested? One would hope the last months rent up front is on the table as well??


26 posted on 09/12/2019 1:44:39 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Cheap rent brings cheap renters...” as my father used to say.


27 posted on 09/12/2019 1:48:20 PM PDT by Gman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HotHunt; BenLurkin
When I had rental properties in Arizona I had a couple of Sec. 8 renters for a while. Treated my properties like their personal garbage dumpster. Never again.

One of my friend filled two 15 yard dumpsters with trash after a section 8 family moved out of one of his rentals.

28 posted on 09/12/2019 1:48:47 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: skinndogNN

So what happens to her when she is 50 an both kids are gone. Does she still get government money?

...

My guess is she’ll go on disability when the child welfare dries up.


29 posted on 09/12/2019 1:48:50 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Charity comes from wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Another directive


30 posted on 09/12/2019 1:50:02 PM PDT by definitelynotaliberal (I believe it! He's alive! Sweet Jesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinndogNN
So what happens to her when she is 50 an both kids are gone. Does she still get government money?

More importantly, will her cats?


31 posted on 09/12/2019 1:51:39 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Isn't it near impossible to get rid of a Section 8 who does not meet the owner's standards of behavior and keeping the place clean? And then there's the occasional problem of unmarried mommy with two kids gets the Section 8, but daddy lives there and deals drugs.

It's the same with the Group Home mess. An owner sets up a group home for people who can't live independently. Sometimes they're good neighbors, providing for people with limited abilities. But some of them are "recovered" drug addicts, etc.

32 posted on 09/12/2019 1:54:37 PM PDT by grania ("We're all just pawns in their game")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HotHunt

Will Condos be the way around it?


33 posted on 09/12/2019 1:55:52 PM PDT by grania ("We're all just pawns in their game")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

There is one house on my block that was sold to a real estate “investor” about 15 years ago.

He split it into 3 apartments and started renting Section 8.
At least twice since then he has had to basically gut and remodel the entire place after a tenant moved out.

One family lived there with a slutty 18-ish daughter. She would ply and cajole local hormone-laden yutes into fighting for her affections. You could set your watch by a loud fight outside that house every night, 30 minutes after bar closing time when a spruned beau would show up beating on the door, challenging the one in her bed to fisticuffs.

I was amazed that house did not mysteriously burn down. The only one on the block that has been any trouble.


34 posted on 09/12/2019 1:56:10 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Just run a credit check. That pretty much sorts out everything.


35 posted on 09/12/2019 1:57:40 PM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

I predict that there will soon be a shortage of rentals in California.


And the usual suspects will express surprise at the shortage. They will direct their anger at ‘greedy landlords’ who are willfully sabotaging, wrecking if you will, the stated goal of the people’s representatives in Sacramento to make sure that every Californian is able to exercise his/her/its right to housing.

As the ‘housing crisis’ intensifies, there will be calls to seize apartments, houses, etc. to achieve this necessary goal. Someone with more skill than me will soon post the comrade’s picture from Dr Zhivago.


36 posted on 09/12/2019 1:58:02 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

If you have to waive a credit check for the “right” tenant, then that tenant is all wrong. I know.


37 posted on 09/12/2019 1:59:47 PM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The Constitution has been repealed...


38 posted on 09/12/2019 2:00:05 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0ndRzaz2o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Well that will certainly encourage more rental properties.

Snort.


39 posted on 09/12/2019 2:00:15 PM PDT by Kozak (DIVERSITY+PROXIMITY=CONFLICT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outpostinmass2

I predict that eventually credit scores themselves will be banned. For being RAAAAAACIST.


40 posted on 09/12/2019 2:00:21 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson