Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarvinStinson

Barr has been turning the wheels to make this happen. The idea that one STATE COURT can rule for all States is absurd.


6 posted on 09/12/2019 10:58:48 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

I believe District Courts are Federal, not state.


10 posted on 09/12/2019 11:04:01 AM PDT by Dr. Zzyzx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

“he idea that one STATE COURT can rule for all States is absurd.”


These are federal District Courts that operate within particular states. They are not state-level courts.


36 posted on 09/12/2019 11:52:54 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

They should add that a state that wishes to sue the Federal government must file the suit in their own federal district. This would eliminate the judge shopping that blue states use to avoid a Federal district court in their district that is conservative. In other words, Indiana should not be allowed to join a suit in California concerning a government policy/regulation. They would have to file in their own district. That way the USSC gets several different decisions and different facts that would have been presented during trial, (Indiana in this example), that may not be presented in a trial in the other district, (California).


53 posted on 09/12/2019 10:04:28 PM PDT by usnavy_cop_retired (Retiree in the P.I. living as a legal immigrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson